Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Why I like this
1. It does not use another game eg War inc/Warz
2. It does not have zombies but instead differnt enemies which do differnt things
3. It does not have a z at the end
This sounds quitte cool
Really? I wonder why it says PC up at the top of the page, next to the game's name.
"Phosphor will launch the game sometime late this fall, and it will be available as a single purchase with different levels of early access, the details of which are still undecided. Microtransactions are being considered, but they will be convenience items—no guns, special ammo, or invincible, three-headed attack dogs"
Deja vu?
;)
You really want these new games to turn out well, but after wasting $50 on the War Z, and ending up with a flawed $3.75 pvp shooter, I think many people will think twice before jumping in early.
Definitely a game worth keeping an eye on, but its starting to remind me too much of the early War Z videos, and style of gameplay, just without so many promises to break later.
Cynical? Blame Hammerpoint.
I think many of us learned a lesson with WarZ.
Yea.
They haven't done the rest of the reputable indie developers any favours.