Cài đặt Steam
đăng nhập
|
ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Seems like a shameful display, indeed.
Will doublecheck for alternatives with every game I might end up buying from now on.
But when The War Z came on steam in the 1st place, it was false advertising (I.E. down right lying) because the feature's that were listed weren't actually in the game, like for example skill tree's.
Difference between false and deceptive advertisment and simply saying "you will have a blast" on the sticker on the front of a game cd or flash page. That's how "False Advertisement" got it's name, not from simply saying "most thrilling game ever with best graphics". No; people here are missing key points to why the uproar with WarZ. It is because of it's deceptive advertising, feature changes on the fly, broken promises, content not provided from the original date during Steams release and many were burned because of it. Overall bad chocies from both Hammerpoint and the developers responses to their own community defineded who Hammerpoint really was as a developer. Bad chocies on their part the blame is not the community or the consumer. Not in this case.