Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Most people have just been using the game as an outlet for frustration (and I am talking about players and journalists alike) but at least PC Gamer had the intergrity to actually evaluate the game with as little bias as can be expected.
EDIT: the link hated being in parathesis
Oh trust me, it was an honest answer.
fixed link http://www.pcgamer.com/review/the-war-z-review/
Most people who say that probably never even played ET for the Atari. I did. I wasn't that bad for an Atari 2600 game.
This is the truth