Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i purchase a image of developer's self confident.
anyway git gud mate, this is arcade game about lucks and gamble, dont gone too far.
Why the ♥♥♥♥ is it an arcade game?
It's supposed to be a realistic RTS game
no its not.
DUDE...
The TAGS ON THE DAMN GAME! say that its a Strategy, RTS
http://steamcommunity.com/app/251060/discussions/0/523898291492336469/
there you go.
well, nice job on comparing fps to a rts, anyway you should looking for something like
men of war, with really "Realistic" engine and setting, wargame just a arcade game with
half-wrong texture and units, and not allow to modding, and dev is shetting bricks on thier
insanity realm of Act of Aggression, they are fixing holes while making more of it.
just a advice from me, before you start bashing "I want this to be realistic", this game is
a nightmare from the start to the end, and the end time is here.
from EE, people think its too realistic and hardcore and a concept showing, so,
dev improved with even more enjoyable battle.
and somehow in AB ,they couldn't even make a succeed single player, but they
comes with a fun multiplayer. its a fair trade in many player's opinion.
but now red dragon, the navel is a messy chocolate tube, the asian units are mostly
wrong, and the single player is a joke compare to EE.
players complain about how terrible red dragon are shown at early of the game, but players
have wait patiently to let dev improve , fix , and changing, and heres our current red dragon.
a loose junk of bloodly biscuit thats not even a biscuit, joke-like-broken holy grail.
so dont tell me hows your AB needed to be realistic, dev is shetting bricks, they couldn't
even decide how to make AoA, and if you want to complain lack of realistic.
just go buy a red dragon, and taste that tears of regret like loose junk of bloody biscuit
thats not even a biscuit, and then refund that poor thingy.
Wargame attempts to simulate realism trough mass RNG. No impact models, no real shell data,
etc...
For example a mk 84 would destroy any tank in actual service.
They are very good if you play with live players, but in a single company this games quite frustrating because of the cheating computer.
Devs release paid add-ons in the form of new troops, but would be better if they remade Artificial Intelligence.
I want to play in single player company, I do not play in a multiplayer mode!
It'd be rude to respond GIT GUD, but it sounds more like you don't know the mechanics. Unless your encountering some massive bugs, it sounds like the initial complaints wre based on misuse of planes and pat's being not fully getting sighting. I'm no expert at Grand Strategy games or RTS games, so maybe ALB is way out there compared to others, but I don'[t get what it is you think is so bad about it.
I do not have problems with the game, I play on easy and medium difficultys. But I just do not like to play when I know that the computer was originally knows where all my units are located and cheat resources.
I do not ask the developers to make a super intelligent AI, but it would be nice if he had cheated at least not so openly.
For rescources, do you mean points for calling in units or the unit's ammo and fuel?