Wargame: AirLand Battle

Wargame: AirLand Battle

통계 보기:
Halogen 2016년 6월 3일 오후 3시 21분
The A.I Is ♥♥♥♥♥♥ [And so is the entire game]
The A.I in this game does nothing but spam Anti-Air Units.. Sees you at all times [Even with no recon] And just over all is a Godlike mess.. The "Campaigns" As they call them are also stupid, as there is a time limit...... FOR A WAR! If you don't complete a task in a certain ammount of time, you're fired and executed [If you're the Soviets].. :steamfacepalm:
< >
25개 댓글 중 1-15개 표시
Halogen 2016년 6월 3일 오후 3시 22분 
And don't go saying "GIT GUD M9!!11" Because I am VERY good at RTS and GS Games.. This one is THE WORST I have ever had the un-holy displeasure of playing..
Lieutenant_Pats 2016년 6월 3일 오후 3시 49분 
yep. Though it wasnt Anti-air. It was infantry who would annhiliate my tanks from the open (???). Or just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of t-72s. Way more than should be possible with their supplies. I uninstalled and will not reinstall or buy a game put out by these guys until they fix their damn game (wont happen). I bought it it so i'd have something to do in the airport. I've played RTSs since i was 5. I can win. But its not fun.
Lieutenant_Pats 님이 마지막으로 수정; 2016년 6월 3일 오후 3시 51분
MewAnthar 2016년 6월 4일 오후 6시 28분 
developer's confident, thats what i paid for.

i purchase a image of developer's self confident.

anyway git gud mate, this is arcade game about lucks and gamble, dont gone too far.
MewAnthar 님이 마지막으로 수정; 2016년 6월 4일 오후 6시 28분
Halogen 2016년 6월 4일 오후 7시 40분 
PacifismAnthar님이 먼저 게시:
developer's confident, thats what i paid for.

i purchase a image of developer's self confident.

anyway git gud mate, this is arcade game about lucks and gamble, dont gone too far.

Why the ♥♥♥♥ is it an arcade game?
It's supposed to be a realistic RTS game
MewAnthar 2016년 6월 5일 오전 4시 06분 
Halogen님이 먼저 게시:
Why the ♥♥♥♥ is it an arcade game?
It's supposed to be a realistic RTS game


no its not.
Halogen 2016년 6월 5일 오전 11시 30분 
PacifismAnthar님이 먼저 게시:
Halogen님이 먼저 게시:
Why the ♥♥♥♥ is it an arcade game?
It's supposed to be a realistic RTS game


no its not.

DUDE...

The TAGS ON THE DAMN GAME! say that its a Strategy, RTS
MewAnthar 2016년 6월 5일 오후 1시 06분 
Halogen님이 먼저 게시:
DUDE...
The TAGS ON THE DAMN GAME! say that its a Strategy, RTS

http://steamcommunity.com/app/251060/discussions/0/523898291492336469/

there you go.
Halogen 2016년 6월 5일 오후 1시 09분 
PacifismAnthar님이 먼저 게시:
Halogen님이 먼저 게시:
DUDE...
The TAGS ON THE DAMN GAME! say that its a Strategy, RTS

http://steamcommunity.com/app/251060/discussions/0/523898291492336469/

there you go.
That doesn't make it an arcade game.. And Arcade game is something like Call of Duty, This game is like Red Orchestra 2..
MewAnthar 2016년 6월 5일 오후 2시 22분 
Halogen님이 먼저 게시:
That doesn't make it an arcade game.. And Arcade game is something like Call of Duty, This game is like Red Orchestra 2..



well, nice job on comparing fps to a rts, anyway you should looking for something like
men of war, with really "Realistic" engine and setting, wargame just a arcade game with
half-wrong texture and units, and not allow to modding, and dev is shetting bricks on thier
insanity realm of Act of Aggression, they are fixing holes while making more of it.


just a advice from me, before you start bashing "I want this to be realistic", this game is
a nightmare from the start to the end, and the end time is here.


from EE, people think its too realistic and hardcore and a concept showing, so,
dev improved with even more enjoyable battle.

and somehow in AB ,they couldn't even make a succeed single player, but they
comes with a fun multiplayer. its a fair trade in many player's opinion.


but now red dragon, the navel is a messy chocolate tube, the asian units are mostly
wrong, and the single player is a joke compare to EE.


players complain about how terrible red dragon are shown at early of the game, but players
have wait patiently to let dev improve , fix , and changing, and heres our current red dragon.

a loose junk of bloodly biscuit thats not even a biscuit, joke-like-broken holy grail.


so dont tell me hows your AB needed to be realistic, dev is shetting bricks, they couldn't
even decide how to make AoA, and if you want to complain lack of realistic.

just go buy a red dragon, and taste that tears of regret like loose junk of bloody biscuit
thats not even a biscuit, and then refund that poor thingy.


Lucky Stralex 2016년 6월 10일 오후 2시 01분 
No, it is not a realistic RTS. Theatre of War is a realistic RTS.

Wargame attempts to simulate realism trough mass RNG. No impact models, no real shell data,
etc...

For example a mk 84 would destroy any tank in actual service.
Wilson 2016년 6월 16일 오전 3시 22분 
Lieutenant_Pats님이 먼저 게시:
yep. Though it wasnt Anti-air. It was infantry who would annhiliate my tanks from the open (???). Or just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of t-72s. Way more than should be possible with their supplies. I uninstalled and will not reinstall or buy a game put out by these guys until they fix their damn game (wont happen). I bought it it so i'd have something to do in the airport. I've played RTSs since i was 5. I can win. But its not fun.
wargame is mean't for PVE, this is the first of 3. Sorry to say AI are crap in everyone of them. Want a real challange? learn to micro manage, and the strategy to wargames than play red dragon for and only for PVP. Just saying.
Cook 2016년 6월 19일 오전 5시 19분 
That is why I dropped all three games.
They are very good if you play with live players, but in a single company this games quite frustrating because of the cheating computer.

Devs release paid add-ons in the form of new troops, but would be better if they remade Artificial Intelligence.

I want to play in single player company, I do not play in a multiplayer mode!
racercowan 2016년 6월 27일 오후 11시 17분 
I've never had the issues you seem to be having. I don't know if the harder AI cheats, but I've yet to see anything errant from the easy or medium AI in campaign or skirmish.

It'd be rude to respond GIT GUD, but it sounds more like you don't know the mechanics. Unless your encountering some massive bugs, it sounds like the initial complaints wre based on misuse of planes and pat's being not fully getting sighting. I'm no expert at Grand Strategy games or RTS games, so maybe ALB is way out there compared to others, but I don'[t get what it is you think is so bad about it.
Cook 2016년 6월 28일 오전 1시 02분 
I am very glad that you like the game and you do not notice how the computer cheats. But in any case, the fact that you do not notice this does not mean that it is not cheating. Make a search on the forums of all three games and you will find a lot of similar posts. For example in Wargame: European Escalation AI units have infinite fuel and aware where your units are.

I do not have problems with the game, I play on easy and medium difficultys. But I just do not like to play when I know that the computer was originally knows where all my units are located and cheat resources.
I do not ask the developers to make a super intelligent AI, but it would be nice if he had cheated at least not so openly.
racercowan 2016년 6월 28일 오후 12시 03분 
It might also be because I play really defensively. Since all units follow LoS and the AI generally won't use arty/air unless it has recently or constantly spotted units there, the AI knowing where things are just may not be easy to detect.

For rescources, do you mean points for calling in units or the unit's ammo and fuel?
< >
25개 댓글 중 1-15개 표시
페이지당 표시 개수: 1530 50

게시된 날짜: 2016년 6월 3일 오후 3시 21분
게시글: 25