安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
"blame yourselves"
And you blame the victims? The people who gave said unethical people money because the either believed the game was complete, or the statements made by said unethical people that the game would be finished. Nice work.
Amazing logic. You know, many people would've been happy if they had just acknowledged the game had problems and promised that they were going to be addressed.
Instead, the developers completely disregarded the problems, told the customers off with an announcement that the game is playable and enjoyable. They took the attitude that the customer was wrong and the customers should've been happy with whatever they got.
They spent the next year implementing pointless vanity features rather than fixing catastrophic flaws or polishing the game, and actually breaking some of the game mechanics in the process because they wanted to release new features ASAP even though they were unfinished and broken (animal feeding, event system, the zombies).
The complete lack of professionalism is what killed the game, not "the jerks that attacked them".