Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
"blame yourselves"
And you blame the victims? The people who gave said unethical people money because the either believed the game was complete, or the statements made by said unethical people that the game would be finished. Nice work.
Amazing logic. You know, many people would've been happy if they had just acknowledged the game had problems and promised that they were going to be addressed.
Instead, the developers completely disregarded the problems, told the customers off with an announcement that the game is playable and enjoyable. They took the attitude that the customer was wrong and the customers should've been happy with whatever they got.
They spent the next year implementing pointless vanity features rather than fixing catastrophic flaws or polishing the game, and actually breaking some of the game mechanics in the process because they wanted to release new features ASAP even though they were unfinished and broken (animal feeding, event system, the zombies).
The complete lack of professionalism is what killed the game, not "the jerks that attacked them".