Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Necro !
A good example why necroposting makes no sense most of the time.
Patch 2.6x improved performance quite a bit, but was released later, in august.
If the game takes 10 minutes to load, then your hardware is the problem.
That is the only issue I have myself... I get good frames and stuff during that but when it gets those autosaves in january, july - it can sometimes take up to 2-3 minuntes for each autosave to actually save.
Pretty sure its a hardware issue. Like I played the game on a quad core etc previously and sure it chunked end game (never 3 minutes) but after upgrading my comp early last year on the cheap, the game runs great.
Also since reapers due the performance vastly increased, it is very noticable end game compared to what it was prior. You may want to invest in a new HDD, it sounds like you have some WD green 5400 rpm PoS that is on its last legs and cant write a 100mb save file at a decent pace (3 minutes makes that 550KB/s)
Most likely the defrag then. I recall using MyDefrag (The monthly option) maybe a handful of times on Win7 and on a slow WD green and that did wonders. Afterwards i let Windows do its thing again, but i suppose the different rearrangement of files by path and zone helped that even Windows own can't mess it up again.
The in theory fastest HD slows down to hell if one relies on Windows own defrag.
@Panicsferd
Basics: More characters (alive and dead), slower game, bigger save file.
Apart from that and tech reasons, don't play without vassals (aka North Korea mode) and it's recommended to not always land your dynasty, to prevent it from growing too much,
as if i recall correcty the succession checks are going for all members of a dynasty, so one realy huge dynasty can slow down the game a lot.
I also have a i7 6700 though too, pretty new build.
AMD 8350 4.0Ghz
8GB Ram
7870 2GB OC Edition
A WD HDD (don't remember the RPM)
and for me it runs fine in-game and I am in the middle of my second long game from the viking start date to currently 1357 and for me it only seems to be slow/laggy when I move the map around when the game is running and then it can take awhile to save during jan/july.
That is currently my only issue, and what I figure is it must be the harddrive since it takes while for it to save and that is why I have to wait the 1-2 minutes or whatnot.
Also if your hard drive is running near capacity this will severly hamper performance also.
The game will drop slightly in speed in the final century or 2 depending on your view (ie your empire is 3/4 of the map) that is just normal. However the drop prior to the performance update around reapers was like from 4 speed to 1, and now its 4 to 3. very noticible increase in performance for megablobs.
all the save is doing is taking data from Ram (fast) to MB (fast) to Hdd (fast) to Hdd (bottleneck).
Hard drive read and write speed has been the bottle neck of modern computers for the last decade.
Full speed???
FYI the top speed is not supported bye CK2 it effectively takes the limit off and sets it to the speed of your processor.....
There is a problem when you do this, and its worse the higher end your processsor is!
In the computer world there are these things called bottlenecks.... and inorder for your fancy processor to processes all that CK2 data at its speed the rest of the computer needs to be able to relay said information as fast as your CPU can process.... Which just isnt going to happen on the really high end machines because the CPU's are faster then the bottlenecks of the computer like the RAM or the BUS speed of the board....
If you happen to have a Processor Mother board and Ram with all the same speeds then speed 5 would work pretty slick.... But its rare people actually build a computer in this way!
Or if your computer is older and your CPU is actually slower then your BUS and RAM then speed 5 will again work great....
But this is not the deal for you! So your better off playing at speed 4 and speed 5 is likely slower then speed 4 because your bottlenecking your computer....
Also for me the other issue like I said before is saving which I believe is because of my hard drive is a regular hard drive and is probably slow (don't remember the rpms off the back of my head) and that is why it can sometimes take longer to save after year 1100+.