Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw5j7w1J-6s
GA was full of players when AVA (PVP) was great. Afther they intorduced PVE it went down.
So don't say that PVE is the right direction.
he's got a bit of a point here
also: this notably leads to just a bunch of ignores and, thus, less socially communicative learning.
I played this game since the beta all the way to 800 hours and I never had any issues getting PVE games, I never bothered with PVP for atleast the first 500+ hours and there was no shortage of people signing on to play the half-baked PVE mode before they even made it lucrative. *now if you mean the open world stuff thats another story*
But PVE instances and Raids were the best thing to happen to Global Agenda, and I really hope they do not take this "PVP Focus" to heart or they will end up just like Firefall over at Red5 studios is right now.