Arma 3

Arma 3

檢視統計資料:
CIA Agent 2017 年 11 月 21 日 上午 2:11
Arma Developers can literally see the future
I don't know, all the stuff in game seems to be happening in real life. The British spec ops was just testing out ballistic helmets a few months ago. Or more like, they just put in reasonable things in game.
最後修改者:CIA Agent; 2017 年 11 月 21 日 上午 2:12
< >
目前顯示第 1-9 則留言,共 9
El Berl 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 9:40 
引用自 dagwood doggo
I don't know, all the stuff in game seems to be happening in real life. The British spec ops was just testing out ballistic helmets a few months ago. Or more like, they just put in reasonable things in game.

If you want to see actual "future-sight", then go play the very first Deus Ex. The thing is insanely prophetic and it came out in 2000 while predicting present-day politics and the ulterior motives of the globalists - ah I should stop.

There is a common rule with regards to "tip-of-the-spear" military technology. If they are claiming to be testing out technology, then it already has been deployed with special forces across the globe. You can see this with Russia and their next-generation RATNIK-2 body armor, in addition to 7N37 and 7N39 cartridges, while also seeing it with the United States and a whole lot of prototype body armor solutions in addition to all other kinds of things.

CIA Agent 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 9:54 
Yeah, most of these stuff came from 2010 after. Which is when Arma 3 developers somehow researched all these stuff though they probably keep in touch with concepts and military affairs, magezines or some techy stuff

引用自 dagwood doggo
I don't know, all the stuff in game seems to be happening in real life. The British spec ops was just testing out ballistic helmets a few months ago. Or more like, they just put in reasonable things in game.

If you want to see actual "future-sight", then go play the very first Deus Ex. The thing is insanely prophetic and it came out in 2000 while predicting present-day politics and the ulterior motives of the globalists - ah I should stop.

There is a common rule with regards to "tip-of-the-spear" military technology. If they are claiming to be testing out technology, then it already has been deployed with special forces across the globe. You can see this with Russia and their next-generation RATNIK-2 body armor, in addition to 7N37 and 7N39 cartridges, while also seeing it with the United States and a whole lot of prototype body armor solutions in addition to all other kinds of things.
最後修改者:CIA Agent; 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 9:56
CIA Agent 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:13 
uhhhh, why were you talking about ratnik lol, thats not future advanced. that was just a modernization scheme
El Berl 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:18 
引用自 dagwood doggo
uhhhh, why were you talking about ratnik lol, thats not future advanced. that was just a modernization scheme

I never said Ratnik was "future-advanced", just "next-generation" as compared to current first world body armor systems. Results from the conflict in Ukraine seem to suggest that RATNIK-2 is superior to current American body armor.

Oh, and RATNIK-2 is not RATNIK, it just came after. RATNIK is already in service with a large portion of regular troops while RATNIK-2 is still in beginning stages of widespread deployment.
CIA Agent 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:28 
引用自 dagwood doggo
uhhhh, why were you talking about ratnik lol, thats not future advanced. that was just a modernization scheme

I never said Ratnik was "future-advanced", just "next-generation" as compared to current first world body armor systems. Results from the conflict in Ukraine seem to suggest that RATNIK-2 is superior to current American body armor.

Oh, and RATNIK-2 is not RATNIK, it just came after. RATNIK is already in service with a large portion of regular troops while RATNIK-2 is still in beginning stages of widespread deployment.
I never knew that, I would think that U.S military would somehow respond in their own to improving individual protection and peripherals. I only know about TALOS suit but that is not being tested for public eyes yet.
最後修改者:CIA Agent; 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:29
CIA Agent 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:47 
I definitely know that CIA has a bullet called the Boeing 767. Its specs are unreal, about 2 million per unit, the bullet is unlike any gigantic black budget, black ops round I've seen.
最後修改者:CIA Agent; 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:47
El Berl 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:48 
引用自 dagwood doggo
I definitely know that CIA has a bullet called the Boeing 767. Its specs are unreal, about 2 billion per unit, the bullet is unlike any gigantic black budget, black ops round I've seen.

It's a powerful guided round capable of traveling many miles as long as it has a few middle easterners with box-cutters in the front!
CIA Agent 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:51 
引用自 dagwood doggo
I definitely know that CIA has a bullet called the Boeing 767. Its specs are unreal, about 2 billion per unit, the bullet is unlike any gigantic black budget, black ops round I've seen.

It's a powerful guided round capable of traveling many miles as long as it has a few middle easterners with box-cutters in the front!
Not to mention those passports which survived the entire situation to show that it was some middle easterner dude piloting. Would really love to have those high quality CIA passport that survived the crash and the fall.
最後修改者:CIA Agent; 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:53
El Berl 2017 年 11 月 23 日 下午 10:51 
引用自 dagwood doggo

It's a powerful guided round capable of traveling many miles as long as it has a few middle easterners with box-cutters in the front!
Not to mention those wallets which survived the entire situation. Would really love to have those CIA wallets that survived the crash and the fall.

Not to mention this!
https://us-east-1.tchyn.io/snopes-production/uploads/2016/09/silverstein-wtc.jpg.jpeg
< >
目前顯示第 1-9 則留言,共 9
每頁顯示: 1530 50