Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The meltdown update changes a lot fundamentally about the game, and I'm a bit unsure of it myself. After playing a bit in it, I've enjoyed the experience of building around the heat system, and the side upgrades are genuinely fairly interesting to build around for the most part, but some other things just feel a bit unbalanced, and a lot of ships in the game just aren't built around the system in general. I haven't made it to the later sectors yet, but I worry that later game ships that are built in will just break due to the nerfs to reactors, among other things.
I assume the since Meltdown is in the preview branch, things aren't set in stone, and things can change, but I'm a little worried about the future of Cosmoteer.
I have considered it. In the end the speedchanges by themselves I could get used to (even though imo it's a senseless change since from my perspective it solves a problem that doesn't even exist), but in the end I would never get used to the wack overclock system.
It's like they wanted to implement the heat system (which by itself is graphically very well done) and then add new weapons (because the community has been starved of new weapons for quite a while, so they will essentially be happy with any new weapons added to the game) and then decided to crunch these 2 features into 1 for convenience or something.
The heats system is not the problem for me (far from it), the new weapons are not the problem for me. Them being packaged into a single one wack feature is however.
I could never get used to overclocking an orange and then getting a cat or overclocking a brick and then getting a pencil. That's not how overclocking works, but it is what heatpipes are designed for. It's just too wacky for me.
So from my perspective they rolled 2 features into one, changing it into a new feature that is changing an important conceptual pillar of the game.
One way to illustrate this is suppose that there is a medieval combat game and it's been developed for a couple years now and everything is balanced around that.
Then suddenly the devs decide to add magic! It changes the whole core of the game and while most of the players will probably like it (in part due to previous starvation of real content), some players really wanted a medieval combat game.
What also didn't help was the initial responce I got from the balance council when I first tried to voice my concerns for the state of balance of the freshly released preview update. For me it made the balance councel come across as immature and as arrogant, even though the main reason for the balance council existing was supposed to be to take balance seriously.
Not that this would in any way change my stance on the actual matter, in the end it's the state of the game I care about.
I expect the majority of players to like this update but it's not my cup of tea. I'm probably staying on the 0.29.0 update and keep tinkering with private versions of my mods from time to time.
I expect my asteroid mods to be very easy for me to keep maintaining though, so I will probably fix these if an update breaks them again.