Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Anyway, in order to solve such a puzzle, you always need some base data where you can build upon to get to the solution. But there's absolutely no basic information in this puzzle. In mathematics you also always need some starting values in order to calculate or to solve an equation or (in puzzles) to fill the gaps by logical thinking. The linked video also shows this clearly. The example puzzle in the video HAS some basic information that is already given and on which you can build upon. Whereas the puzzle in the fifth age of your room hasn't any base data! And if there is such data... where can I find it???
Jeez! I've actually overlooked the letter on the table. How's that possible that I didn't see it? Thanks.
You're probably mixing it up with the woman in "Falstaff in the Washbasket" (-> scene 3), which features a woman in a similar pose. The two women can best be told apart from the different poses of head and hand.
Forgive me if 'lifestock' is an archaic spelling, but shouldn't it be 'livestock'?
If you have another one that I missed, please let me know!