Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It says that my schedule is BASED on analysis by EBFM. I clearly state that it's my own schedule end not EBFM's schedule.
"Why use his name if you're not going to actually share his schedule ?"
Because I used his findings, so I should give him credit for that.
I just aggregated them differently, proritized different attributes and also took injury susceptibility into account, which is why my schedule looks somewhat different.
So TLDR:
Your comments are pointless because I never claimed that this is the EBTS schedule or that the EBTS schedule is the best.
It's also worth noting that his schedule forgoes attributes entirely (Marking, Tackling, Positioning, Free Kick Tacking, Long Throws, Penalties, Jumping Reach) compared to the default sessions, in order to achieve a maximum amount of attribute gains in other categories, and maximum CA gain.
In fact these attributes grow LESS with this schedule, than if your players didn't train at all.
Check https://youtu.be/DiXpGVUMlM4?t=1291
One might actually prefer to have a maximum amount of attribute gain, whilst minimizing CA gain, as to have 'more room' for further development. Just a tought.
It also completely disregards Match buffs / Squad dynamics .
Unless I'm mistaken your claim about match practice not being significantly better is completely refuted in the actual video's / spreadsheets.
Also, your schedules aren't even close to the schedule that's actually proposed by EBFM ? Why use his name if you're not going to actually share his schedule ?
All in all, his schedules are amazing in a "lab" environment, unfortunately they don't really work in the actual game, since some attributes are weighted much much much more heavily on the match engine than others :
https://fm-arena.com/table/18-attribute-testing/
Pace/Acceleration are so dominant, that they should be prioritized by any training.
TLDR :
1) This isn't even EBTS
2) EBTS isn't the actual best