Having Arpad be a part of the Dulo dynasty is kind of weird, and it makes them use the dynastic title name despite being feudal christians by the later bookmarks. The Bolghar ancestry claim is dubious anyway, it probably shouldn't be in the game or at least the Arpad founder should be a bastard

2 more seperate houses in game that belong to dynasties: Berg-Ezzonen, Austrian house of Babenberg-Popponids/Robertians.

very very gooood job i like this mod！

Sorry, it's not your mod doing it, I misspoke!

For some reason when I use this mod I have no courtiers in my court after starting a new character! I think it conflicts with something but not sure what.

@Ligarset In my recent update I changed the founder of the Kayi Tribe to the Character named Qayi in the Oghuz ancestors, so it is now in the Oghuz Dynasty.

Thanks for the update! Can you add Kayi House under Oghuz Dynasty? Historical accurate

Sorry @东海之大鳖 it should be corrected now. Thanks for letting me know of the issue.

House Husaynid and House Nizarid from Dynasty Fatimid should be Dynasty Hashimid.

glad to hear that have a nice day bro

I plan on updating it to make it compatible with the latest version, but it will take me some time

hey man any updates?

thx update :)

@Vielus sorry for the delay, but I have just updated the mod based on the latest vanilla changes. As for the status of this mod, I am not actively developing it, but I still plan to maintain it to keep it working with future vanilla changes, although I can't guarantee how long I will do that.

is this mod dead?

Are Karenids North Iran still unrelated to parthian house?

And another like 867 Rashtrakutas in Kannada and 1066 Rashtrakutas in Kanyakabhuja. But history is quite murky here since at that exact moment North India was under Ghaznavids raids. And the Dynasty that is supposed to be 1066 Rashtrakutas should actually be Gahdavala Dynasty which originated from Rashtrakutas mother. By 1090 Gahdavalas managed to boot out Ghaznavids from North India aside from Punjab for good. The last info is just for a trivia sort I don't think this mod is supposed to fix that big thing.

here is an 8 yo reddit post discussing same https://www.reddit.com/r/CrusaderKings/comments/4kexak/why_are_there_two_rashtrakuta_dynasties/

@Conan1001 thanks for incorporating my inputs, here are some more dynasties that should be instead houses of bigger dynasty.

The Bhauma pala dynasty of Kamrupa (Assam) was a cadet of Pala dynasty of Bengal.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pala_dynasty_(Kamarupa)

In between character history of ruler of duchy of kanyakabhuja, capital duchy of Kossala there exist some Pala Kannauj something, don't exactly remember but they were also cadet branch of Palas.

@Riaman thanks for the info! Upon investigation, the vanilla history files had the marriage as patrilineal, which was causing my mod to change the parent dynasty of Chalukya Chola. I explicity set the marriage to matrilineal and now the house is back under Chola in my recent update.

Weiming's ancestors had two dynasty named Tuoba. After loading the mod, the two Tuoba will be merged. Would the author change it?

Kulottunga I and his son vikrama chola are considered to be part of cholas. Making them part of chalukyas is also narrative breaking since they were having chola-chalukya or tamil-kannada struggle going on.

Chalukya chola was considered a cholan dynasty because his maternal grandfather was of higher status. And he was a Tamil king not a Telugu/kannada king. Consider it as a maternal marriage. The vengi chalukyas father of founder of chalukya chola was a vassal of cholas.

Just uploaded an update for the 1.11 Vanilla version

some files are changed in the new patch/dlc, mod is out of date :(

No update for the new version?

thx for update

Sorry for the delay, I have uploaded a new version with the Vanilla 1.10.2 version incorporated.

Is this still working with recent patches?

ahh ok thats a shame . The game lacks anglo-saxon houses

@daniel.lord no you aren't doing anything wrong, that entire dynasty is extinct before 867. I believe the latest ruler from that dynasty was the ruler of Lancastershire and died in 799. If you check the history of Lancastershire they show up as the earliest ruler in the history.
This mod is mostly the result of a program I wrote to go through the history files and link up dynasties that descended from another, so it also does this for dynasties that are not playable in the 2 vanilla starting times.

nice mod, im trying to find a playable char from Ingving: Eadricing, Æthelfrithing, Leodwalding. Cant seem to find one in either 867 og 1066. Am i just doing something wrong?

its all good bro, at least you made something beneficial to the community. im here sitting on my ass playing it.

The vanilla game has Hashim's ancestors assigned to the Hashimid dynasty, which is why it is considered the parent dynasty. I know this is not historically correct. The overall scope of this mod is to simply connect dynasties and houses based on parent-child relationships. There are actually a large number of instances in the vanilla history files where dynasties go back many generations before the historical founder.

umm thats wrong. Hashim and the rest all belong to the Banu Quraysh. Should have made the hashemite a sub division but the main branch.

@Caloens2k1 yes, most of the new dynasties are because they were founded by bastards. I would assume this mod would work with the mods you are describing, but if you run into issues with a certain mod let me know and I can investigate further.

Also, why did you made new dynasty? Is it because they're founded by a bastard?

Will this work with mods that change dynasty/family name or COA?

ok, the mod should be up to date now with the vanilla changes from 1.9

sorry for the delay, I will be working on updating the mod over the next few days.

No updates?

Whether bastards create new dynasties is determined whether bastards inherit titles, which is controlled by the faith of the individual. You may want to look at religion mods to see if there is a mod that changes this behavior for the faith you are playing as.

can you make it so that bastards don't create new dynasties

Heh, and if you regain interest in playing Crusader Kings 3, will you keep adding more content?

@QisoUlven right now I have lost interest in playing ck3, so I am not actively updating this mod. I still plan on updating it to make it compatible with any updates in the vanilla game that come out, though I can't guarantee for how long I will do that.

ayo are ya planning to add more cadet-branches?

yes, Paradox has started making the changes that were originally in this mod, In the 1.5 update the vanilla game added a bunch of cadet branches, especially in the France/Germany/Scandinavia region. In the 1.5.1 update they added a few more. So this mod isn't doing as much converting as it used to, since vanilla has taken over some of these cadet branches. It is up to you whether this mod is still needed, the description is up to date on what the mod is currently changing.

Is the mod still needed? A lot of houses were compressed into their mother dynasties with the dlc/patch. Not all of them?

Love your mod. Keep up good work!

Le Blount was only added as a house of Sigurdr in vanilla in the 1.5 update which was about a month ago, so that might be what is causing the confusion.

i am using a mod called additional start dates and cultures i am using that mod for like months before i started using that mod house of blount wasnt cadet branch of sigurdr dynasty but after i started using that mod house of blount started showing up as cadet branch of sigurdr dynasty i thought my mod was doing that thing thanks for the information :D