Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
It’s correct that the profit calculation is currently inaccurate and could still show a profit even when there is actually a loss due to mixing costs.
It’s also true that neither seeds, fertilizer, nor soil can be directly included in the calculation.
The most accurate approach would be to treat the base prices as an investment and consider them in the profit calculation.
Net profit should be the final selling price minus the cost of added substances and minus the base price.
Let’s take OG with a base price of $38 as an example:
Now, two substances are added for $4 and $9, and the product’s value increases to $44 and $49.
The tool then shows a net profit of $36.
$36 profit sounds good at first, but it’s actually not a real profit.
In this case: (49 - 38) = $11 as value increase against an investment of (4 + 9) = $13.
Therefore, the actual net profit would be -2 dollar, not +36 dollar.
e.g.
Costs:
OG Kush Seed = 30$
Banana = 2$
Total: 32$
Sellprice: 50$ which would result in a Profit of 18$
One of those features is to block all domains that are newer than 30 days, because new domains are often used for nefarious purposes.
If this is the case for some people, it should resolve itself once the domains gets older than 30 days.