Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1. Just to get the increased production situation. Without the military it's only possible to either improve production or infrastructure, but with the synergy of military funding and military investment you can get both.
2. Only to purge the generals, yes, although the relocation of teachers and doctors decree is also useful, because it allows you to recover the economy of Agnland without investing into GASOM.
3. 4. I didn't veto it, on turn 6 I wrote "sign Central Bank Act (-9)". The energy price bill probably happened because you vetoed it.
5. I didn't get exposed, because as long as you control the media and the Assembly not even the Anti-Corruption Police can touch you. Although it's kind of silly because my media control was through Koronti, but it still works.
I have 5 questions:
1. What’s your reasoning behind funding the military, when you don’t intend to fight Rumburg?
2. What’s your reasoning behind pursuing dictatorial powers? Is it simply to be able to enact the decree to purge the military leadership? (1 Red indicator turned orange, but then you get new negative “Green Generals”)
3. What’s your reasoning behind vetoing the Central Bank Act?
4. Did you not get the Energy Price Control Bill in your run?
5. Did you not get exposed as corrupt in the end, after Tusk, Marcel and Albin reveal the bribes?
Thanks again!
"The USP will join the statement with the NFP. We will argue that Bludish people are considered Sords before the law, as Mr. Kibener suggested."