安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
His changelog is all over the place and doesn't include issues that come from using UPB, but for example with just the Basic patch you can obtain weapons way earlier than you're supposed to. More importantly, it actually changes a lot of dialogue options around, the only way you'd be able to tell is if you compared the unmodded game with the UPB, good luck launching that on W10/W11. For a game that's always praised for the role-playing elements and 1-on-1 conversations isn't it important to keep this one aspect exactly the same?
I point this out because everywhere you go the Basic version is always advertised as "preserves the original experience while only fixing bugs", when that's not really the case.