Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Calculating it seems fairly difficult with the number factors involved. It does seem to be working decently well on the Veteran setting however.
At any rate they would somewhat boost the RTE of all the missions.
I have not yet advanced to Very Hard myself, so i suspect other constraints (the money) would make that non viable. But then again - the extra time might allow to fit extra profit launches in? Usually in turn based games time is the most important factor and especially early turn savings have the potential to compound into a huge advantage.
Now im doing the normal run trying to get 1st in all milestone missions.
Im wondering, the win the race to mars as all 5 agencies, does it count if you change your agency flag and agency name to something else?
I agree I need to do the math for a better comparison. The problem is it's very complicated with all of the variables. At best doing Crewed Moons would get you 35 more Funds/month (1 more tier). There's also some upfront costs for the building, clearing trees, and the astronauts. The astronauts and upkeep are approximately 35 funds/month. Then you have the 5000 research cost for the mission.