Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2. Rosalind and Robert are technically identical but they do have disagreements, However nothing will change if you were to switch their places.
3. Big sister would just take the child to keep the cycle of Adam in Rapture turning.
4. Depending on which ending you got in Bioshock 2, "Bad Ending" Eleanor could've either not cared or just killed the child.
5. Little girl Elizabeth (The one we see saving songbird in "Burial at sea 2") would've probably cried next to the child, but that image is of her when she was still around her teens, she wouldn't really just be trying to comfort the child like the other Elizabeth.
6. Delta and "Burial at sea" Booker DeWitt could also be why why the child is crying, as they've also made other children cry in the past.
7. Wouldn't making the child laugh and comforting it be in the same category,
I get that this post was clearly made as a simple joke but i just CAN'T help myself XD.