Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
You might consider trying almost-Pythagorean triples too. One of my favourites is 15² + 26² = 30^2 + 1 ≈ 30.01666², which is so close to 30 that the grid still lines up great. (It's only off by 13.33 centimetres.) And it happens to be 60.02° too!
Aesthetically, I also like the smaller buildings I can utilize -- I think the 2x3 low residential buildings look the best so 8x12 allows me to fit exactly 12 of these in a block with no wasted space. Also -- and this ultimately doesn't matter for the in-game mechanics -- the 2x3 buildings *look* denser because they have less wasted space on things like yards.
Nonetheless this was an interesting read, I never really thought about optimizing for just density because I've always been so anal about my grid lining up perfectly while still having diagonals.