Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So instead of it I made tiny "districts" on arterials between districts and applied "old town" policy (ban on through traffic). This doesn't get rid of private transport completely but still allows for higher than normal ridership.
And "Fix the traffic" was easy once I realized I'm not supposed to destroy existing districts and THATS why I'm losing population goal.
But "Alpline Villages"? It's HELL. It's unplayable. I don't know how whoever tested it won it. I suppose they didn't use glitches like pods, or any mods, but then how. Maybe it's easier if you use metros, but SMALL ALPINE VILLAGES WITH 9 THOUSAND POPULATION ARENT SUPPOSED TO HAVE 20 SUBWAY STATIONS.