Steel Division: Normandy 44

Steel Division: Normandy 44

Not enough ratings
The Community's Division Rankings (and the Rest of the Division Ranking Survey)
By Chief Berto
The Community's rankings of the divisions from the Division Ranking Survey.
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Overview
Here are the rankings of the divisions from the Division Ranking Survey. The survey asked specifically about ranking for 3v3/4v4 Random Map games. The ranking was created by a score made from data of each sides Division rankings, the best overall divisions, and the worst overall divisions by 100 SD:44 players. Then below is the raw data from anyone to see the backdown of the questions.

Community Division Ranking General Discussion:
http://steamcommunity.com/app/572410/discussions/0/1697168437869860603/
Division Rankings
Rank- Division
_________________________

1st- 12. SS Panzer

2nd- 4th Armor

3rd- 15th Scots

4th- 17. SS Panzergrens

5th- 2. Panzer

6th- Groß-Paris

7th- 2nd Infantry

8th- 3rd Canadian

9th- 7th Armor

10th- Guards

11th- 21. Panzer

12th- 3rd Armor

13th- 1st Pancerna

14th- 352.

15th- Panzer-Lehr

16th- 9. Panzer

17th- Demi-Brigade

18th- 16. Luftwaffe

19th- 101st

20th- 91. Luftlande

21st- 3. FSJ

22nd- 116. Panzer

23rd- 2e Blindee

24th- 716.

25th- 6th Airborne

26th- SSB

Division Ranking Survey Data
There is the raw survey data:

1. How many hours have you played?



2. How much do you play each side?
(That's 1 for "I have and never will play Allied")



3. Do you prefer random map matches?



4. What multiplayer/skirmishes matches do you play the most?



5. What are your five favorite divisions?



6. How would you rank the Allied Divisions for 3v3/4v4 Random Map?



7. How would you rank the Axis Divisions for 3v3/4v4 Random Map?



8. What are the 5 best Divisions for 3v3/4v4 Random Map overall?



9. What are the 5 worst Divisions for 3v3/4v4 Random Map overall?



10. How do you feel about gameplay balance?
13 Comments
Delta-118 Mar 12, 2020 @ 6:24pm 
What about the 1st Infantry? I didn't see them anywhere in the data...
Mad Apr 27, 2018 @ 10:51pm 
@b4ry People are fine with complex games, but the thing is is this game and the rest of paradox games is they do not explain the game well at all, Im fine with trying to learn this game but the 3 hours ive put in, i cant tell if its RNG or just that one of the system is broken on my play style, but either way it has made me really wanting to come back to the game, But ive got a buddy who enjoys the game so ill keep on tryin
b4rystoteles Apr 8, 2018 @ 6:27am 
We have to be aware that such games will not draw many people ever again. It could be quite easier like 20 years ago but apparently people got dumber recently so they don't enjoy a bit more complicated systems.
DNW 🇮🇹 Mar 30, 2018 @ 10:42am 
Great work man,
Great game!
Alloy Mar 28, 2018 @ 1:11pm 
Well said.
Chief Berto  [author] Mar 28, 2018 @ 12:44pm 
Still the community, although small has really developed into something really great. Look at all the tournaments, discords, and youtubers, pretty cool for such a niche game. I really don't have much trouble finding a match, or even folks to debate decks and tactics with. At the end of the day I'm really happy with a good cult following over a bigger and more cancerous audience. As long as the Eugene guys are getting some slices of pie I'm good with what we have.
Chief Berto  [author] Mar 28, 2018 @ 12:44pm 
That said Ive had some really interesting discussions and debates about it with quite a number of people. Must of which I've had on a couple of the discord channels like vulcan's and the steel division tourny channel, and a few as private messages. I've been pretty happy with the feedback and debate that I've gotten from the survey. Sure I'd love the game to have a bigger following, mostly because I think it's a flawed masterpiece, already one of my all time favorites, and also because I want Eugene to be rewarded and continue following this path.
Chief Berto  [author] Mar 28, 2018 @ 12:44pm 
Maybe, but I think alot of people just looked at the order I put up in the discussion thread. I figured most people would just be interested in the order, but I wanted to provide the data so that the ranking had some credibility, and it couldn't be accused of being doctored by my own opinion. I personally think the data is really interesting because if you look through it you'll see how different peoples views are. I mean the SSB had 2 votes as the best allied division and 4 votes for second, and it was DEAD last in the ranking. But I know must people just want to see a ranking and thats enough as long as its transparent.
Alloy Mar 28, 2018 @ 11:32am 
The amount of views this 'guide' has really shows the sad lack of interest in this game. Which is a shame, as this game is very well-made.
Chief Berto  [author] Mar 27, 2018 @ 6:23pm 
Haha since it's come out I've been playing up the list from the bottom