安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
umm... Bethesda. you do know that the moon landing happened in 1969 when space travel was a new thing right?
bethesda kraken,
quick
delete thia comment before IGN shares this in their main story.
ops.
nvmd.
- User never said anything about "not liking" landing on the planets. They pointed out some of the major flaws WE ALL agree with.
- This is an official response from someone who is disgruntled over the negative response to the game, letting emotion drive them, not logic, experience or ethics.
- Most unprofessional thing I have seen. Bethesda, learn to listen. Don't tell the people giving you money anything except THANK YOU!
Said my piece. GREAT REVIEW!!!
Bethesda, consider reassessing your business ethics.
Starfield is a video game and games are supposed to be fun by design. Exploration in Starfield IS boring and soulless while at the same time failing to execute on this Devs supposed goal of making your feel small thanks to the incessant loading screens.
Barren planets may be accurate in their portrayal of space but that does not translate to a rewarding experience here.
Starfield forfeits all of the elements that made previous Bethesda open world games so appealing.