Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
umm... Bethesda. you do know that the moon landing happened in 1969 when space travel was a new thing right?
bethesda kraken,
quick
delete thia comment before IGN shares this in their main story.
ops.
nvmd.
- User never said anything about "not liking" landing on the planets. They pointed out some of the major flaws WE ALL agree with.
- This is an official response from someone who is disgruntled over the negative response to the game, letting emotion drive them, not logic, experience or ethics.
- Most unprofessional thing I have seen. Bethesda, learn to listen. Don't tell the people giving you money anything except THANK YOU!
Said my piece. GREAT REVIEW!!!
Bethesda, consider reassessing your business ethics.
Starfield is a video game and games are supposed to be fun by design. Exploration in Starfield IS boring and soulless while at the same time failing to execute on this Devs supposed goal of making your feel small thanks to the incessant loading screens.
Barren planets may be accurate in their portrayal of space but that does not translate to a rewarding experience here.
Starfield forfeits all of the elements that made previous Bethesda open world games so appealing.