Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In other words, you're the cancer. Not the community.
I admire your (blind) faith in the matchmaking system. I really do. I also find your strawman to be quite fascinating. Here I am talking about attitudes and there you are talking about skill levels. Perhaps you might want to reconsider posting that previous opinion of yours. Cheers.
If you really don't understand the correlation between skill and attitude in normal matchmaking, then clearly you don't understand how the game works. Perhaps you might want to consider actually using your brain to think about that, and then responding. Cheers :^)
Oh, really now. You make a claim that there's a correlation between skill and attitude in normal matchmaking and then leave it at that, claiming I don't understand how the game works. I'm not sure if you're deliberately trolling or are just daft like that. You throw some half-assed statement out and expect people to accept it? For one, your logic is flawed. If most of the games I've played since beta with PEOPLE OF MY CALIBER have been relatively event-free (with the occassional douche interspersed in my games), then where does your argument stand? Perhaps you mixed up lower skill brackets with low priority brackets?
Perhaps you might actually want to consider taking an online class in logic. I'm sure that would help you loads. =)