安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
What is the least amount of points to make a flat polygon (face)?
1? No that would just be a point.
2? No that would be a line.
3? Yup! You can definitely make a single flat surface no matter what as long as the three point vectors are linearly independent.
4? Nope. You can technically have non-faces with 4 points.
Let's take a look:
From the top, both these polygons look flat (left is a quad, right is a tri):
http://i.imgur.com/BSCQ9PB.png
However, you'll notice that from a different angle, the 4-faced polygon isn't actually flat...
http://i.imgur.com/lCLn9w2.png
3D Programs can work with quads just fine, but engines limit their models to tris because that is the minimum amount to make faces. When you export your own models via the smd exporter, you'll notice that it automatically triangulates your model (Try it: Export a test model as an smd file > import it back into blender > suddenly it will be made up of tris instead of quads).
Obviously modelers don't model with tris... They model with quads first, and then go in and detail (manually editing stuff, sculpting, etc).
...
...
...
why did i ctrl + T and then save?!??!? T-T
xD