Game Discussion

[Plank]

Here you can discuss games from our list.

[Superfabs]

I have to disagree with the curator review of NEKO-GIRL PLAY. It's pretty boring, takes about half an hour to finish, only has ten puzzle phases, and is a basic carbon copy of the previous. Nothing new, and feels like minimal effort was put into it. Way better stuff to buy at the $1.99 range in the lewd genre. I'd probably give it a 2 out of 10 or so...

My negative store review

[Superfabs]

Oops! Did I just copy myself? :smirk:

This review is totally wrong and fabricated for Paladin Lias. People can get all this information from the store page and pictures anyway, so why even write a curator recommendation? What a slap in the face of followers... I hate to be involved with this criminal activity of game thievery.... and falsehood. Makes a mockery out of a game, makes all of us look like a joke, and it's because of greed and self-centeredness... without assisting development/publishing in fixing problems, since they didn't play, or did not play long enough to encounter problems, which were happening in the first battle in the game, less than half an hour into it!

Curator says:

“Hentai RPG. The story is silly but the girl character design is hot. There are 60+ special events with partial voice acting. The ♥♥♥♥♥ is uncensored, but the ♥♥♥♥ is mosaic. Hardcore without pure love”

No again on Paladin Lias. It should be Paladin "Lies" in this case. Also, the last line should say "Hardcore fake review without pure love", since they didn't care, and just wanted to rate it and move on.

This is very inaccurate, as per usual from the source. It was unplayable because of glitches I'm helping to fix. It was not just me either... That's why gametime played is hidden by the one that picked this game up for review... I know for sure they did not play it through. Did not mention a lot of stuff you encounter a little bit further into the game, so it lacks any true substance. It's just vague garbage... slop thrown together by an inept game hoarder, just to show they made a "passable" review, yet they may have spent five minutes playing, if that. All because they want to take more. Quantity, and not any attention to the game, it's substance, or detail... and just greed for quantity. Baffling...

This was just sloppily thrown together and I know without a doubt they didn't play it. It makes our curator look bad when lies are thrown around and an unplayable game is touted as playable. The curator recommendation doesn't even give the reader any information on the game. It's copied from a store page or something.. with no genuine thoughts put into it, then rephrased. What a goddamn joke. Pathetic. F- for effort.

Makes me sick to my stomach to have these types involved with projects. I'm actively WORKING WITH the developer to fix the game, since they blatantly missed the need for many touch-ups in the game as I'm playing through it, unlike the source of this curator piece, who I guarantee did not put many minutes into the game, or they're playing a different game... one I once played, but was smart enough to get out of, since there are other games in life more rewarding than deception and manipulation. That is all.

[HEKAU]

Originally posted by Superfabs:

This is very inaccurate, as per usual from the source. It was unplayable because of glitches I'm helping to fix. It was not just me either... That's why gametime played is hidden by the one that picked this game up for review... I know for sure they did not play it through.

Yea, I can confirm that the game was unplayable for about a week or so before the first patch update came through a couple of days ago since I also received an early copy of this game to review from the developer.

[EndarkCuli]

So I've honestly been mostly out-of-the-loop when it comes to group activity and it's admittedly been by choice; a lot of IRL stuff happened in early 2021-ish that really soured my mood. However, I feel the need to speak up about the recent Curator Review for "Girls Overboard", specifically the line "No +18 though." The game does in fact have 18+ content available as free DLC; it might not be in the base game, so that it can still be sold in countries like Germany with stricter content laws, but the game was indeed designed to have 18+ elements and implying otherwise is simply incorrect.

[HEKAU]

Originally posted by EndarkCuli:

So I've honestly been mostly out-of-the-loop when it comes to group activity and it's admittedly been by choice; a lot of IRL stuff happened in early 2021-ish that really soured my mood. However, I feel the need to speak up about the recent Curator Review for "Girls Overboard", specifically the line "No +18 though." The game does in fact have 18+ content available as free DLC; it might not be in the base game, so that it can still be sold in countries like Germany with stricter content laws, but the game was indeed designed to have 18+ elements and implying otherwise is simply incorrect.

Does this not show up for everyone?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2010140/Girls_Overboard_18_WetnWild_DLC/

Also, I hope you're doing better overall and 2022 has been a better year for you in general.