!❤🧡💛💚💙💜REP 4 REP INSTANTLY!!!❤🧡💛💚💙💜
!❤🧡💛💚💙💜REP 4 REP INSTANTLY!!!❤🧡💛💚💙💜
REP 4 REP INSTANTLY!!!
ENG: Copy&Paste one of these OR write whatever you want and I will rep you back 100%
𝚛𝚎𝚙 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛 🏆
+rep 𝚏𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚕𝚢 🐾
+rep 𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎 💜
+rep 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚛 🔥
+rep 𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚏𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚜 😈
+rep 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚠𝚙 ✨
+rep 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚎 🔥
+rep 𝟿𝟿𝟿 𝚒𝚚 🧠
+rep 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚞𝚜 👑
+rep 𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝟷 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛 🔝
OR ANY +REP 🙂
PS If im not gonna answer fast don't worry that means i got COOLDOWN for commenting, im gonna give 100% all back

funny how both admins are community banned LOL

where do i get videogames, i have a linux

I am searching to play with someone in Civ6/Civ5 (especially). There were installed native of Civ6 and Windows version of Civ5.

I can also play another games via network.

I love GNU.

No Linux No Life

https://sourceforge.net/projects/alien-os-3/files/

Alien-OS 3 ,now has English ,multi language release.

Started from cli now we're here.

Take a free Tux emoticon! just offer a trade with me, (I have 74) https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffer/new/?partner=43398563&token=mDjNYMCh

No Linux (Support) - No Money. :-D

Check Out Alien-OS at https://www.alien-os.de

@KBz This is so great

Neat,

I found it interesting https://linuxgsm.com/

fedora is bae

Anyone could play me with Civilization VI: Rise and Fall?

Is that a serious question?

Of course it is.

Im looking forward uninstalling Windows and put ye old Fedora again but is it worth it?

Xubuntu is my current favorite as well. Linux Mint has a lot to offer, as do countless other distros, but for now I agree with Piezo_ that Xubuntu has an (almost) perfect blend of everything I desire from an OS/DE.

I've always preferred Xubuntu, to be honest. I've tried other distros, and other flavors of Ubuntu, but they all fall short of that perfect blend of stability, customizability, and user-friendliness that is Xubuntu.

Also, it's perfect for my ideal workflow, which is about 75% GUI, 25% CLI.

And, most importantly, G A M E Z

@Liniuta „whats your favorite linux distribution? my like kali linux”:
I don't know, because for many years I was using only OpenSuSE. I'm like typical Windows user - using only one system, but there's difference. Windows users think, that Windows is best OS ever, but didn't ever using another OS than Windows. I'm using only OpenSuSE, but I'm know that probably there exist OS better than OpenSuSE.

@Liniuta, Right now I'm using Elementary. It's ran over ubuntu debian, so all my drivers are there and most software is pretty accessible. On my other PC I am running opensuse with gnome.

whats your favorite linux distribution? my like kali linux

Hi guys, working on a startup to bond playonlinux and Steam, as well as do some other things. Right now working on a cross-platform platformer.

Copypasta is ruining this group.

Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag.

Thanks for listening.

Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD?

If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this:

You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument.

Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it.

(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?

There really is a Windows, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Windows is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Windows is normally used in combination with the NSA operating system: the whole system is basically NSA with Windows added, or NSA/Windows. All the so-called “Windows” versions are really versions of NSA/Windows.

I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Windows, is in fact, NSA/Windows, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, NSA plus Windows. Windows is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another locked down component of a fully functioning NSA system made useful by the NSA corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by the government. Many computer users run a modified version of the NSA system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of NSA which is widely used today is often called “Windows”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the NSA system, developed by the NSA.

The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run.

RIP Mesa users right now.

17.2 is a flaming ball of INTEL_DO_FLUSH_LOCKED FAILED

hello linux users

420. All is good again. XD

I'm sorry, 405 now.

Great, now there are exactly 404 members.

I'm waiting for full GPU virtualization on QEMU/KVM.

I am bored.

running a gigabyte gaming mother board x99 intel i7 5820 with nvida 1030 and a amd rx 580 and now have linux gpu pass throught up and running on it wahhoooo :D

k

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.

linux is fake news

hey guys just join the group cause i moved to linux full time not planning on going back to windows spyware s..t :D

Hey everyone, new to the linux atmosphere but i love it! if you want to hang out in discord talk linux and gaming add me!

@InterDimensionalOwl If I can't run them, I just don't even bother reviewing them, honestly.

Hi all new to the group. I wanted to ask how you all handle your reviews for the games not supported in GNU Linux.
Now I have switched I don't like leaving recommendation for games I can no longer play, however they are still good games. How do you all handle your reviews on Steam?