login
|
language
Български (Bulgarian)
čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Suomi (Finnish)
Français (French)
Deutsch (German)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Italiano (Italian)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português-Brasil (Portuguese-Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
Español (Spanish)
Svenska (Swedish)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
ไทย (Thai)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam








We have the backwards compatibility we actually care about; I'll change out the HMD and controllers as I get tempted by new technology and features, but my Vive bases will be mounted to my walls for as long as they continue to function. By the time they DO fail, I'll probably have replaced the rest of the setup with 2.0 gear at a minimum, if not 3.0.
You would have to work with "half of half" the 1-5mhz modulation bandwidth, but I don't see why you couldn't do it. We already have different modulations for the sync flash.
If we want the cost to go down for next generation VR, so more people will adopt it, we will just have to accept the loss of complete backwards compatibility. This is the cost of being an early adopter.
The previous diode used OOK or ASK (probably ASK due to the mentioned interference issues from the clock timer pulse)
So, the TS3633 photodiaode (binary OOK/ASK) receives an "on" pulse when it "sees" light, and is assumed to be "off" when it doesn't see light. There's two frequencies the gen1 base stations produce for the TIMING flash (channel b and channel c), which is detected by both the base station's single TS3633 and the HMD's. This is modulated. The current diode detects either "lighthouse sweep" intensity or "timing flash"(b or c) or "nothing."
Either way you could still pull some info and support the new stations somehow - but only up to two, right?