Kết quả tìm kiếm

I play both games but I like cs than valo, because of how it feels, The reason I played valo because of its low counts of cheaters specially in my rank, in cs 10k higher is infested with cheaters specially when you play in SEA servers.

wishlisted

Лично у меня раз через раз. То сразу пускает, то нужно пару раз нажать повторить. Сегодня вечером за 2 часа вообще не пустило... казино... зато в 6й батле проблем с этим не было

That made me realise I had the wrong quest from him, I had one for Portalstein which seems to be a later quest, had to go back to him to get the right quest for the construction bench, now working on building the carpentry bench and something more substantial than a thatch hut.
Also bought the BP for a wooden well just because having to find one of the available wells on a regular basis was bugging me.

Thanks again

Nguyên văn bởi Blood Cat:

Nguyên văn bởi Vrizik:

I see you've already forgotten about the REPO, which has dropped online to 25,000 players per day. Yes, it's not a little, but online in such games is still noticeably drained.

I haven't forgotten it forgotten it, I just don't have it so I don't keep up with it

nice

Nguyên văn bởi 🅱🅾🅱:

Nguyên văn bởi gwwak:

Public thread baby. Once you post it in public, people are free to interact with it as they please as long as they are not violating Steam's rules.

buddy a lot of ppl have violated the rules in this thread

In that case they will suffer the consequences of their actions.

You can also ask Isaac about Ginger Swan.
But also, check your log first, did you even get to the part where you find out about it?
What's written in the mission log for this quest?

Shadowmist hands down!

Nguyên văn bởi The_Box:

Nguyên văn bởi Spring Breeze Dancin':

You're allowed to not like things about games that get released, however silly or petty your reasons may be. The onus is on the developers to make games that you want to purchase, not the other way around. If they make something that you don't want to play, it only makes sense to point out to them what the reasons are, in the hopes that other developers will take notice and take your grievances into consideration.

Video games are a visual medium, therefore the visuals are highly important whether you realize or acknowledge it or not. The purpose of the player character is to provide you with an avatar through which to experience the game world. Therefore, if you do not like the avatar the creators provide you, it is entirely reasonable for you to point this out. After all, you are probably not the only person who feels that way. These effects can be exacerbated when performances come into play. Just as one would dislike certain actors or fictional characters in other media for whatever reason, someone could dislike a game character for exactly the same reasons. Except with gaming, the critical exception is *you* are the character.

Both game sales and developer provided statistics have repeatedly shown that male characters and traditionally attractive characters of either gender, in that order, are vastly more preferable over any other alternative. This is in spite of what social media says, and in spite of the fact that statistics also show the gender divide between gamers is closer to even than it was in the past.

So what you're saying is that games should be made via focus group, with zero room for artistic expression or interesting stories the devs might want to tell, but ONLY what will sell best? No art, no expression, no unique stories, just whatever the market says the most people will buy? And no room for stories that aren't designed for the straight white male audience either? No games or stories that someone else might feel represented by, just what YOU feel represented by?

That sounds like a pretty sad place where gaming eventually just dies and every dev is just releasing the same game over and over.

Nguyên văn bởi The_Box:

Nguyên văn bởi Spring Breeze Dancin':

You're allowed to not like things about games that get released, however silly or petty your reasons may be. The onus is on the developers to make games that you want to purchase, not the other way around. If they make something that you don't want to play, it only makes sense to point out to them what the reasons are, in the hopes that other developers will take notice and take your grievances into consideration.

Video games are a visual medium, therefore the visuals are highly important whether you realize or acknowledge it or not. The purpose of the player character is to provide you with an avatar through which to experience the game world. Therefore, if you do not like the avatar the creators provide you, it is entirely reasonable for you to point this out. After all, you are probably not the only person who feels that way. These effects can be exacerbated when performances come into play. Just as one would dislike certain actors or fictional characters in other media for whatever reason, someone could dislike a game character for exactly the same reasons. Except with gaming, the critical exception is *you* are the character.

Both game sales and developer provided statistics have repeatedly shown that male characters and traditionally attractive characters of either gender, in that order, are vastly more preferable over any other alternative. This is in spite of what social media says, and in spite of the fact that statistics also show the gender divide between gamers is closer to even than it was in the past.

So what you're saying is that games should be made via focus group, with zero room for artistic expression or interesting stories the devs might want to tell, but ONLY what will sell best? No art, no expression, no unique stories, just whatever the market says the most people will buy? And no room for stories that aren't designed for the straight white male audience either? No games or stories that someone else might feel represented by, just what YOU feel represented by?

That sounds like a pretty sad place where gaming eventually just dies and every dev is just releasing the same game over and over.

Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying. /s

There's a gap lightyears wide between focus-grouped corporate games, and niche auteur games. I will always support creative's vision for their work, but gaming is also a business that needs to make money in order to survive, and there's a happy middle-ground in it where everybody can win.

If pushing artistic boundaries with their protagonist was their goal, it clearly didn't help them much. Almost nobody played this game and few people who did even bothered to review it. This is a game that desperately needed to be a success, and now the developers have lost a majority of their staff. Maybe Tron is so irrelevant that the game would've flopped with a different character anyway, who knows? I actually don't have a problem with female characters, believe it or not. We're just doing a post-mortem for a game in a franchise that we love, and we're simply pointing out one thing that might've made the game better for a few of us.

Il just wait till its 3 months before release of the next duo expansions when renegades and edge of fate will be 80% off together.