Результати пошуку

Цитата допису Kiktor Uzo:

IJN Yugumo is rank II, sinking enemies with her torpedoes won't count towards the challenge, need rank III+.

IJN Kiyoshimo isn't available for purchase right now. Assume people who claim they almost don't play naval haven't bought her when there was such opportunity.

Acquiring IJN Yuudachi might be even more difficult/expensive. And what for? Just +30 BP points? The easier and cheaper way would be to just purchase 3 levels with GE, provided one has already purchased the BP itself.

IJN Shimakaze costs 260 000 squadron RP if you don't wish to spend GE, you need to have her already unlocked to complete the challenge with as the shortest term of getting her for SL is (260k/20k)*3 = 39 days, with every challenge (except those unlocked for certain BP levels) lasting 21 days.

Hence, IJN Akizuki is the only viable option for every single player who just started playing naval/installed War Thunder today to complete the challenge without dubious investment of real money, it only takes some hours at best or a couple of days at worst to unlock her. And it's the Japanese tree, because no other nation has nearly as powerful torpedoes (95%+ guaranteed kill upon a single hit from 10+ km distance) for their bluewater fleet at rank III. [/quote]as you can tell i dont pay attention to challenges but as to torpedo ships those i do know and none of this makes akizuki the best pick

so if we are limited to rank 3 the better torpedo boats are the aforementioned kiyoshimo which does come back on sale occasionally, yuudachi which is available in the market, yukikaze a newer premium, Sendai a light cruiser at the same tier and BR as your akizuki, or if we dip into tier 4 agano.

all of those have twice the torpedo armament of akizuki which is literally the least of the type 93 armed ships in terms of ammo, of course this wont matter as much if you are playing arcade and getting reloads but for RB where you are limited to what the ships carry that is a lot more chances per match

mb time to improve awper ???

If anyone knows how to solve the problem with the disappearance of plant labels from the mini-map, I would be grateful.

Цитата допису Howl:

Sounds like another rager that leaves matches too often because they are toxic lol. Enjoy your ban the rest of us are better off for it and having fun. We don't need baby ragers throwing games

I bet you love sitting in spawn with no healers on ur team in qp because you're so mature :)) Oh wait you're a kid typing crap on steam forums :(

Let me guess ur American?

If it crashes how can they notify you lol

Ok sar!

Pick shifting Earth's mountain. Clear the entire mountain.

In times where games like Helldivers 2 shows how to respect players time and money, the "big ones" still try to activate your FOMO just for their greed. I don't get it.
After an hour of playtime i won't buy this kind of games anymore.

I will stick to Helldivers 2 and single player gems and maybe someday a modern warfare game will try the beauty of fair games.

So long and nice try EA

摘星市场进不去怎么办

Цитата допису Vertigo:

Цитата допису Wo ist meine Mercy :(:

I’m not saying I’d immediately know how to make it better and I don’t think I need to be able to make it better to criticize it...

I think it’s important to point out problems. In the end, it’s up to the community’s feedback whether anything changes or not. That’s how I see my post.

I want to be sure I that I am not coming across as critical of you for saying things should be changed. I think people should have ideas because said changes are hard to do.

Most of the posts on these forums are "killer/survivor has it bad and needs fixed!!!" To many people want to complain instead of offering ideas.

Yeah, I get your point. If I had a simple idea on how to fix everything, I’d probably send a job application to BHVR myself :D

But exactly because I see the flaw in the design, I don’t think it’s something that can be easily fixed. I’m honestly stumped myself… and yeah, frustrated too

As for the general tone in the forum yeah, I agree with you on that…