搜尋結果

gorebox psvr2 would be great

引用自 JoseRodriguez：

As much as I totally prefer TQ2 over PoE2 and have a post about it myself, I know it won't. Because a lot of people now accept live service so they can brag about their grind and Gen Z only known such games and never noticed TQ1 or Grim Dawn before.

Live service makes ARPG's like whole another genre, sometimes for the good, but biggest examples like Diablo and PoE flopping in spectacular ways, actually failing not the gameplay part, but live service part. These games require huge effort to keep themselves relevant, but when they fail, they only result with repetitive grind, MTX, no story worth remembering and FOMO with seasons and events.

This will never be the case with SP focused ARPG, I still enjoy TQ1, roll around in GD and enjoy TQ2 despite being in early access, because when TQ2 reaches it's end of development, it will be filled with lots of content that you can enjoy and experience from the very start, but when live service reach to end of their development they die and you can't approach because of all the bloat and missed content.

Some people enjoy this, unfortunately for PoE2's case, people expected an improvement and solid experience. Yet we have loot boxes, forgettable events and another instance-driven grind fest leading to no accomplishment other than just impressing a few newcomers in the starting zones.

Grim Dawn multiplayer was straight out of the 90s. For an ARPG that is a big no no and they have had countless years to fix something up and its still dog doo.

引用自 anaris：

also fyi bo3 gives ever so slightly more (because sometimes someone will concede after the first match, and you still get the credit as if you'd won two)

Definitely notice that too, also notice bo3 can take a long time in queue during certain times also.

Are you going to sink more than a 100 hours of gameplay in? If so, then yeah it's probably worth it. The total cost divided by total hours of game play time, what you project, is it worth it?

Call of Duty has become garbage sorry. It used to be so much better

引用自 burger boy：

hmm, might have to avoid that then.
-- as i'd prefer to continue seeing the devs, the game, and its characters as fantastic.

People are usually very over dramatic.

People hated the hell out of Mass Effect 3 ending, I didn't think it was great but I didn't think it was bad either.

I dont think anything in the game is going to make me 'radically' change my opinion on it. I already thought the quality and content was going down hill a few updates ago but overall I still think the game is fantastic too.

I haven't made it there yet due to traveling but I really don't think it can be as bad as everyone is making it out to be.

Citadel's sentry on cart mechanic can cause steamrolls to steamroll even harder, plus the extreme verticality long sightlines make it sniper heaven, you can get shot from another country on that map.

Aquarius' speed boost and no drowning mechanic makes Heavies absolute monsters on it, headshots and backstabs are hard to do under water, giving heavy near free reign in it.

Boardwalk is a reskin of a reskin...

Cargo is 90% the same shade of gray. Theres no color variation and it overall just feels way too monochromatic, even by tf2's drab art style standards.

Demolition has junction now beat as the smallest map in the game, punishes your team for capping the point by adding extra down time, half the map just straight up isn't used, and has not one, but two demospam towers over lookin the point.

Mannhole is neat, but the entire underside is almost entirely unused and just becames a power class blitz so supports and picks may as well not exist.

Pressure's intel room is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ massive, the corridors are tight, and the underwater tunnels make returning the intel way too easy, and a pain the arse to protect any dropped intel in.

Fulgur is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE. Not like enclosure huge, but the indoor spaces don't feel indoors with just how massively wide and tall they are, bit of a mixed bag.

The only ones I have no serious problem with are conifer and blowout

引用自 AmaiAmai：

The devs are already working on other projects.

See the issues with this game, and MH: Wilds is that both don't need your average developer doing random easy tasks. They need engine developers and debuggers that aren't available because they are working on newer games. There is no universe where a for-profit company will halt development on a new game to fix a product they already sold that you cannot refund unless shareholders told them to

That means, in essence, you can expect no real fix. The key timeframe to see if an issue will be fixed is in the first 6 months. If an issue persists beyond then, it's safe to conclude it will never be fixed because it means that the developers:

1. Lack the skill to fix the issue

2. Poorly planned out the project making the issue impossible to find and fix in an appropriate amount of time ( remember TIME IS MONEY in a corporation)

3. The issue is a result of a critical system tying the game and its parts together and it cannot be fixed because the game cannot work without it

or

4. The developers/publisher simply don't care about your experience.

It's up to you to decide which you believe as long as they don't come out and admit their incompetence. They cannot admit incompetence because their core line of business is porting and appear as "experts" in that capacity.

To have a failure, to have a blemish, and to admit it would be a destructive step in their business -- or so the top blockheads might be thinking.

Guarantee this game would get attention if the games media had not given it a free pass with the "jank" excuse.

I would literally prefer if they just sold fixes as much as consumers would hate it. The fact your completely right is so frustrating.

9726

引用自 RRW359：

引用自 Maverick：

Wowee, sources PLEASE! lol

I thought the "Harrowing of Hell" was fairly common in Christian mythos.

How much of the bible have you read?