Sökresultat

man, you haven't seen everdark libra yet

Ursprungligen skrivet av Darkstorn:

Ursprungligen skrivet av hippotype:

wasn't 3 steps. either way i am not getting that involved for an EA game.

You can try to spin this off as an anti-EA crusade but it's not EA, it's everyone doing it now.

Your settings are being obsolete and change is being forced upon you. Instead of accepting that it's a skill issue, you're trying to make it into an EA issue.

Cute, but ultimately pointless: You don't see Windows XP users complaining. And you people are essentially Windows XP people.

It's literally the same ♥♥♥♥ as with TPM: Now people are in denial and are saying stuff like "TPM is fine, but secureboot is not!" but they all went through this same cycle of denial you are exhibiting right now.

i am not blaming EA. i am saying doing any kind of work for an EA game is not happening. personally, id rather just not play.

Zero

Ursprungligen skrivet av Wasp:

"Intel Core I7 processor (Gen 3 i think? Old but not that old)"

If you mean Ivy Bridge (3xxx series) than that is ancient. Those came out in 2012. It's even below the listed minimum required CPU (Intel Core i7-4790K)

Helldivers 2 is really CPU intensive game. having that godawful kernel-level anti cheat that doesn't stop cheaters doesn't help either. Last summer i was able to run the game at acceptable framerate (45-60 fps) on an RX580 with a Ryzen 5600 @ 1080 without upscaling. Now? Doesn't matter what i run this thing on. So your system is really old and the CPU is even below the minimum, but the game started to run worse too.

The performance really took another nosedive recently sadly. 5800X3D with 7900GRE and on Atuomaton City maps i can see dips below 30 fps @ 1440p

You can try turning on Async Compute in the the options, that might help to push some work from the CPU to the GPU.

Damn, i didnt know it was that old lmao
Thanks for the advice

no input lag at all here. 9800X3D, PNY 5080, installed on NVME. Running ultra settings, DLAA, 144fps locked, zero probs. I DID get that strange poly spike bug once, where it pinches the screen to the center of the screen. But it went away quick.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Skyblue:

Ursprungligen skrivet av rabapraba p:

Know a lot of extroverted loners?

Social movers and shakers alone in the whirlwind they create?

Introvert just means they lose energy being around people and extrovert means they gain energy being around people. To recharge, the introvert needs to be alone sometimes and the extrovert needs to be around people.

Has nothing to do with being a loner or not, an introvert can still have a strong circle of friends and such.

can an extrovert be a loner? you've avoided answering this, instead substituting an example involving an introvert who is not a loner.

You can still get the achievements. Whenever is shows 0% it most likely means they’re still new for players.

The devs of this game lack the most basic understanding of how electricity works. Best you can do is put a manual switch between the solar and battery bank so you don't have to rewire, but yes the solar panels "override" the battery bank for some reason during the daylight. Maybe there's a mod that addresses this?

Ursprungligen skrivet av GLMSYJ:

Nope I was able to start the game and play with decent FPS. Now, after update game won't start anymore crash at shader loading screen.

1. If overclocked try to reduce to standard clocks
2. Tried clean up the entire game config/cache etc? %LOCALAPPDATA%\Nightfall

Ursprungligen skrivet av oak:

Ursprungligen skrivet av MethAtic:

... snip ...

Mate what did I do to give you the impression I'm interested in debating your one-eyed napkin math?

One person stated (stated) that Starfield "didn't move the needle on game pass subscriptions".
Microsoft themselves state it did move the needle.
Story. End.

Now you want to get into the weeds on other ♥♥♥♥ I have zero interest in talking about: cost of game production. I'm not a Microsoft shareholder, I'm not a MS exec, I'm a consumer. TBF IDGAF how much money a game cost to make, it's entirely irrelevant to my opinion on a game. Companies with vast sums of money spend vast sums of money making things that will never seem to be worth it to the consumer. Have you looked at the list of most expensive movies? This isn't a game-centric issue.

If you want to tie yourself up in knots making an argument that the game wasn't worth the investment, you do you but I'm not your audience .
Are you pitching for a job at Microsoft to steer them right? Maybe they'll see your comment and listen.

You say you’re not interested in discussing sales, refunds, or ROI—yet you dropped a Microsoft earnings report to claim Starfield “moved the needle.”
So which is it? Are we looking at corporate performance, or just personal vibes?
You used a Game Pass stat to deflect from actual game quality, player retention, and Steam reviews, then acted offended when someone followed the logic to its conclusion.
That’s not debate. That’s bait-and-switch.
• 6 million players (not sales) = mostly trial users.
• Drop-off within weeks = low retention.
• Steam numbers tanked. Reviews hovered at 40–50% for half a year.
• DLC released = barely moved the needle.
You don’t get to wave “Microsoft said it performed well!” as your mic drop—then immediately say “I’m just a consumer, I don’t care about money” when someone questions whether it actually performed.
If Microsoft throwing money at a Game Pass promo counts as success to you, fine. But don’t pretend it settles the debate.
Because if Starfield “moved the needle,” it’s only because it triggered a massive reality check across the gaming world on what AAA bloat looks like.
You’re not above the argument—you’re just ignoring the parts you can’t spin.