Resultados de búsqueda

Is this intended or are there just not enough players? I'm very new to the game (bronze 2) and it feels like you would need to grind for a LONG time to hit GM.... which means lots of game knowledge/far better builds than a newbie. Why am I consistently up against GM's?

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2802636837
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3525522195
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2868392160

Thanks for the feedback!

I've decided to make Robot Unlock free in a week.

I'm happy I've made this game, I'm happy some people found it and had fun with it.

I was hoping the game would generate enough funds that could sustain me while working on my next title but this is not the case.

I'd like to thank my supporters! The game will continue to be as playable as it is today!

这游戏玩 着像吃屎 一样难受。300块买了一坨屎

Thank you for the report.

Publicado originalmente por PizzaSHARK:

ABF ain't a factory game. Agriculture before the 2x2 is a pain so I wouldn't bother with it. Some room for improvement there but automatic harvesting and other forms of automation really wouldn't fit this game.

Automation is a part of the lore. For example in the main underground complex there's a robot whose job is to look after the garden and the plants in it. So why can't we build a similar one at our base to do the same?

because EA has or ever had licences ... because FIFA has licences lol IDIOT

Publicado originalmente por Jaldebaoth:

If you enable secure boot, but don't have the right certificates installed (hard to tell on a lot of motherboards), then essential firmware files will be prevented from loading and your machine will not POST. That's called an expensive brick. It's hard to predict how your motherboard and other hardware will respond to having secure boot enabled, unless you know what a Key Exchange Key is and what an Option ROM is.

Many people leave secure boot disabled on purpose when building their PC, since it adds zero security and just adds another fragile layer of complicated ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ just for the sake of security "theatrics." If you dual boot, or just have multiple drives you would like to be able to boot from, then you are making your life more complicated and giving yourself more work to do in order to set up secure boot to work correctly, for zero security benefit.

Secure boot is not designed to stop you from modifying your own machine, so it is more of a barrier for normal people, and not cheaters.

Absolute BS, you haven't a clue and go learn what secure boot actually does when coupled with a kernal level anti cheat

If your main game is WH3, I'd highly suggest to get a 9070 (xt) and return/sell any 5000 series card. Even the 9070 is better than the 5070 ti in pure raster, like wh3, which hammers its raw performance and the vram bus. The 5000 series are very problematic, not only for wh3. You will get butter smooth performance with 9070 (xt), most importantly stable framepacing and can play native without framegen aka nvidia's smooth motion, which causes all kinds of artifacting and ghosting. It's simply not possible to play wh3 natively with any 5000 gpu... that's why I didn't bought the 5070 ti, which I had my eyes on initially and went with amd.

This is NOT CA's fault, but purely on Nvidia (it worked with < 5000 series and CA is not responsible for Nvidia's mess, nor do they owe you), even when amd radeon always plays best with tw games (and most games for that matter), it's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ drivers and hardware stack implementation by nvidia that are cutting corners and upshifting tiers to get as most profit as possible vs delivering value for money, like you can get with amd.
Unless you need cuda, blender, tensor or best hw encoder, there is no reason to go with nvidia, at all. Nvidia always has worse latency and framepacing than amd radeon since rdna3. The only edge nvidia has for gaming is that it usually is plug-and-play (like apple) vs amd that requires some tweaking to get the best experience (like android), but when you do that, it outshines nvidia by a mile (e.g. sync and render flip issues at worst, for people who got complex systems like mine, but once you fix this, you get rock solid perf and efficient setup).

You can easily verify this with recording the framepacing and notice how much more nvidia (micro) stutters vs amd, with much wider consistent fluctuations in frametimes and this goes all the way back to the 3000 series (which I've also owned), as also witnessed by Kitguru who made an entire video for wh3 specifically on Youtube. This STILL is the case today with nvidia, for any game for that matter. You simply will never get that peak immersion with nvidia, I know, because I also tested with a 4090. There are always from time to time huge frametime spikes, causing (micro) stutters out of nowhere. You can also verify it has much worse latency with latencymon than amd, it always goes back to nvidia drivers, but ignorant people always blame amd for ♥♥♥♥♥♥ drivers, which is ironic, since it's the complete opposite and not blaming MS that automatically update their amd drivers with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ MS ones... same as SOME people do by blaming CA when it's Nvidia whose to blame for.

Conclusion:
Get a rx 9070 (xt) and ditch any rtx 5000 gpu. Don't expect any fix from nvidia (soon or ever, it might be unfixable if it's on the hardware level and any driver update from nvidia since last year makes matters worse and worse, also for 3000 series, hence my upgrade to amd and it exceeded my expectations with butter smooth experience and zero problems). I don't expect CA to fix this either and it's NOT their responsibility doing so, when everything worked fine for ages and only the 5000 series have this problem. Why spend resources on something they maybe even cannot fix as it's out of their control and domain, that doesn't make any sense. There is a reason why the 5000 series (except 5080-5090) are below msrp and why they get an additional price cut, which is unheard of from nvidia...