搜索结果

I have another quarry line which has a capacity of 150. Yet the supply says 100/400. Vehicles are leaving the depot with partial loads. What the hell gives?

Most likely GPU driver issue. If you use AMD card, their latest driver doesn't support OpenGL. You need to rollback the driver to the latest version that supports OpenGL.

If you use multiple monitors, unplug the others but your main monitor.

引用自 hamdog：

引用自 Mickk：

My steam level is 43 if your actually interested.

no it isn't. it says so; Level 0.

Private profiles don’t display steam levels, they always display 0.

Yours does too.

Okay, at least it's not just me...

Quick response, I have said pretty clearly that PVP should not be neglected or abandoned. It's not like I'm saying the game should cancel PVP and go full PVE. So no more word twisting.

Also, like I said multi-player requires a fair environment. What's the point of playing a match with bunches of people using cheats and exploiting bugs? What's the point of playing when people can constantly leave matches without penalty? To experience asymmetrical warfare?

Even for big game companies like Activision, EA, Ubisoft and Tencent, their games are having massive cheater issues despite how much they've spent on anti-cheat. Their match making system aren't perfect neither.

So, for a small dev team like this, perfecting single player is a much more feasible goal. I spent most of the time playing PVP and still haven't finished the campaign. But we can't neglect the amount of SP and PVE players there are.

We can look at examples of Gate of Hell:Ostfront, a single player focused RTT. It has average player count of 2600 this month. While Company of Heroes 2, also a WW2 RTS, but more PVP focused, has around 2570.

So, being SP and PVE focused doesn't mean it'd be any worse or dead than being PVP focused. As long as the game has in-depth while fun gameplay, and be content-rich, it's just going to be as good as PVP centric games.

And telling people to play another game is absolutely a pointless and unproductive answer. People are dissatisfied with the game now. Dissatisfied with both SP and MP. It needs practical improvements. And perhaps changing direction of development is a way to improve the game in short-mid term.

Not releasing dedicated server software would be a gigantic mistake by Kunos.

The reason AC still holds up is due to people still using it for multiplayer. Single player in AC is abysmal, as it is in ACC. So if Kunos does not improve the AI for AC:EVO and/or add dedicated servers they might end up with a deserted game once the initial curiosity dies down.

okay cheers for the response, might be a bug with one of the mods. Gonna do more Testing.

引用自 Straat：

When a game was too many times delay, you lost the most part of the community, why communicate so much about feature of the game, depriving players of the surprise of discovering the game, the same principle as spoiling a TV series. Your Discord is mostly empty, and while you were supposed to announce the exact date of the early access release, you instead release a demo and tell us that the game won't be released as planned when it was already pushed back more than a year initially? You already have little visibility and you're shooting yourself in the foot.
It's a shame because the game seems promising, but this is too much.

…gimme gimme gimme. Instant gratification or I‘ll throw a tantrum.

Good things are worth waiting for.

i just wanna say ı liked doorman and hıs kit thanks valve

引用自 kalashnjkov21：

i guess improving destruction and gameplay is their top priority. Things like increasing player numbers failed in 2042 and they dont want to use it for now.

Okay, but it's not normal that 21 years later it can't be done when that time period ago you could play it without any problem and with a connection 100 times slower.