搜索结果

25,818

https://images.steamusercontent.com/ugc/14057727903257711766/51BEE81268F134EC410F9E3D8BE874D405DC251A/

They have no soul.

won't open on a macbook

引用自 Shaken_Widow：

引用自 Memester：

okay but what does that have to do with battlefields potential player count? Thats not an accurate depiction of whos going to play the game? I have no doubt that if secure boot wasnt a requirement we would see a huge spike in player activity, if not it being doubled. The fact that everywhere i go i see constant back lash on secure boot, even from people that have it enabled, because its kind of outrageous to force something so dumb and lock potentially millions of other players out of a game all because you cant make an anti-cheat

Also is there some defining argument against me here, or is this the desperate attempt of a shill to discredit my point of view?

considering EA actively discussed with the community and the majority who participated in labs and such explained they were okay with secure boot i would say yes, it has to do with battlefields potential player count because it was directly related to bf6.

these mental gymnastics need to stop, you aren't winning any arguments by creating voids in the discussion that can actually be filled with legitimate context, you're helping yourself lose the argument.

that is the overall percentages of users using w11, w10 or older, that is definitely not the w11 and w10 users on bf6. You can literally look it up on pcworld. that in no way accurately tells you how many people are going to play the game using what os.

the fact that the game only had 9k pre-loads day one tells me a huge portion of people are locked out, and the fact that only another 5k got on today tells me that an large portion of people are locked out. yeah maybe not half because yeah thats unlikely but i wouldnt be surprised. my argument is still very valid even with an exaggerated statement

Voltes was in the last game so Daimos could be in.

Ultraman would be awesome, particularly if it's not Iron Man Ultraman, before anyone says anything, Netflix had an animated movie with a giant Ultraman, and there was a whole 80's anime with Ultraman Jonias, not all Ultraman also have a standard host to force an actor, Ultraman Nexus for example, has such a lack of a host that in crossover appearances, he has chosen characters of the show he crosses over with to be a temporary human host.

Ultraman Nexus is one you could literally just make up an OC character for, same goes for Ultraman Zero while we are at it.

Anyways, Govarian would be nice, a Go Nagai series that still has to enter in SRW.

The second Gaiking series would be awesome too to see appear again.

Tekkaman Blade is something i wouldn't mind seeing again either.

引用自 blkcrow：

Are Angel and Monica compatible?

Yes.

Thank you

引用自 Daniil：

You can now tick option to skip before-after mode in Settings

Thanks SO Much!!!

Now this is how its done, 5.8. release was step forward.

I think op has a point and almost everyone else is off topic. Game is supposed to be about what happens if your average city person suddenly finds themselves in an apocalypse.

I grew up in the country, skinned and ate plenty of rabbits with my family. But now I live in the city and out of every single person I know here, none of them are like that. Would they kill a rabbit by hand if they had to? Sure. Of course. They'll be hungry. But I guarantee the average person would get sad at the experience. At least the first time.

So I can see the character in game, unless they already have the desensitized trait or brave or something else that would explain why they went from starbucks barista to stone cold hunter, getting a sad moodlet at the very least the first time they killed a bunny by hand.

Anyone I know in this city would probably start crying, panic, try to give up, make the situation worse somehow, and end up successful in the end but with a bad experience. The next time they might be more careful to do it quickly and not think about it as much because they need the food.

This post isn't a question about what's right or wrong or trying to shame anyone for anything. It's not peta. It's a genuine question about how would the average person react in this situation. Most average city dwellers have NEVER seen a small cute animal outside of cute tik tok videos or pets. They definitely haven't eaten rabbit stew and even look at me like I'm weird when I say I like to eat rabbit. Some straight up say they would rather starve than have to kill their own animals.

So if we are thinking about realism and immersion? Op's right, a sad moodle makes sense.

引用自 Darth_Angeal：

引用自 Prince_Tavi：

Invisibility works differently in Frosthaven. Things that are invisible are not considered obstacles, so enemies should be walking through invis characters, assuming it would allow them to attack or whatever, though they still can't end their turn on the same space.

And that´s something to question... (I´ve not played the boardgame so.)

I´ve also seen enemies moving around a stealthed Blinkblade and even tooltips say that stealthed characters count as obstacles. It´s actually only been the case once in our runs that skeletons walked through it.

So either the description is wrong or this has been a bug.

It is probably just conflicting enemy priorities.

In gloomhaven original(boardgame) invisible things were untargetable, and counted as obstacles, so you could do dumb crap like stealthing in a doorway and monsters would just stand there most often doing nothing.

Frosthaven(boardgame) changes this and enemies can now walk through invisible characters as well as hit them if they happen to be inside an area of Aoe attack.

What is happening currently is probably the enemy AI confused about various things, they count as obstacles only in the way that you can't end your turn on them. So your skeleton was probably trying to get into a muitiattack position despite not being able to target the blinkblade.

I dunno. But yeah it needs refining.