搜索结果

引用自 ♂Aniki♂：

Mechanics of all new characters are overcomplicated garbage, waste of time

They're not overcomplicated, you're just slow...respectfully.

when there will be a 3 D platform game

引用自 AP0THICx：

引用自 pillowcase：

That's a good point I never tried a combination like that. I'd like to think they wouldn't allow situations like that to occur but that's probably a stretch.

There should be exceptions to an open class load out. Maybe you can select any primary/secondary but the gadgets or kits would need to be restricted to various things.

Gadgets and kits are restricted to your class no matter the playlist

hum yes and no
this is why player can abuse on some build .
its a Kit equiped system , not a class system , the equiped kit will define the template loaodout of the soldier .

since its open weapon , players can use advatange of the kit equiped regardless of the weapon . at the end when unlocking all attachements on weapon , some debuff become marginal to use signature weapon of a kit . aka support with sniper , AR for recon , ...

to resume , its seems EA build a loadout system based on perks
you equip perk "recon" , kit ,
- player can acess a range of gadget for this kit
- kit give tiers bonus advantage when equiped

with this , they can create some group family kit , based on "role" they want for the game , for example create a kit "recon 2" that can use air strike attack on last rank tier bonus point
or just get the ability to use binocular gadget

this is mostly 'll be the system of loadout perks used on CoD battle royale

i play what i want lol i dont give a damn about those MO,s xd

ggs

oh! okay that's surprising. so becoming a summoner means learning the right skills. check.
thanks!!!

I hope they add our German collaborators too. I want have diversity in the battlefield

I was thinking this:
https://youtu.be/bkHdInyyGV4?si=wYLe5Rio33SsOjGG

It's something people were asking for.... although destroying spice fields seems unlikely...

引用自 S☯wn=Lﺤuꁅhtǝr：

引用自 Carlo Mig：

well i mean im a junior software developer and i solder/microsolder electronics on the side so i dont really have any issues financially. what i have an issue with is ♥♥♥♥♥♥ business practices being defended by bootlickers that make it look like youre broke just cause you dont want to shell out money to support anti consumer practices. so yeah

So then you as a programmer think artists shouldnt get paid on games that run as service models or online playerbase ..


Let me guess the grand plan

"Free to play, and rotation of characters except your main specifically"

Nice strawman. I never said artists shouldn't get paid I said I won't support anti-consumer practices. There's a huge difference between "developers deserve compensation" and "it's okay to paywall characters that used to be included in the base game."

You're acting like the only options are either the current nickel-and-dime model or some free-to-play nightmare. What about the radical concept of... paying once for a complete game? Like we used to do? Like Tekken 3 through 7 already proved works?