Результаты поиска

Автор сообщения: J.C. Stripes

I don't feel for the employees.

I concur. The guy working on sound and basic coding is definitely to blame for what their parent company decides.

Автор сообщения: convulsive

срок действия ссылки истек

Пересоздал тему в обсуждениях

I was just about to sacrifice Bing Bong for MESA, guess the gods upstairs heard of my intentions and so Bing Bong remains uncooked today.

I got a easy win by starting with the general with the slime guy.
Got a few swamp slimes and a lot of generals. The slimes buff everyone with the same name, so every general will get the armor buff and they themselves buff themselves up with dmg.
Later I finally got a ogre and surrounded him with the generals and at last I got a king who scaled super fast.
2 Miners for gold at the top row of the board (I had 3 swamp blobs, so only 9 height or however big 3 of them are is needed)

On everyone's SOUL we are all using the extreme gear

Автор сообщения: BotanX

Glad to hear that! This is really great encouragement for us. Thank you so much!

I love the game a lot. I'm very excited for the release. Are you aiming for 2026? Just one piece of feedback you might consider. I think the story would be better if it wasn't isekai, like us being thrown from the modern world into the past. I would prefer if the story was simply set in ancient/medieval China without any isekai nonsense.

Автор сообщения: Steezy McDude

Personally, I'm hoping some other studios jump on the opportunity to create a game competing with the likes of Civ... But I've been hoping the same for a historical Total War-like and so far no luck.

Ara, Humankind, and Millenia all gave it a go but did not do too well, I'm not sure if other devs will be so eager to make a historical 4x, but we'll see.

What do you mean with a "historical Total war-like"? Many of the Total War games are historical.

Balki Bartokomus.

Недавно нашёл капсулу с Лаской. Выходит, что в старых капсулах всё ещё можно найти яйца

Автор сообщения: Altimely

Notice how the argument isn't "extend people's rights to publicly burning pride flags" and is instead "restrict people's rights so they can't protest by burning the US flag". Why does the right jump to take rights instead of extend them?

Also just a heads up: Burning a pride flag targets a specific group of people who have been ♥♥♥♥ on by the nation. It's punching down.
Burning an American flag is an expression of anger with the government, aka the people lording over everyone and shaping the nation. Punching up.

They're not the same.

Punching down or punching up doesn't matter. All that matters is that people have an intrinsic right to express themselves. There are just some punches that shouldn't be thrown at all.