Resultados da pesquisa

Add me to play :)

You have a game ban, not a VAC ban. It's your account, so you'll have to figure it out.

Originalmente postado por Revilar:

So does this mean people gave EA money to gain early access for a beta?
Because if that's what we've come to, there's no hope for the future of gaming.

It's been a thing for years with Beta Access / Early Access being offered when you pre-order some games.

But in EA's case? No. Pre-ordering doesn't get you access to the "closed" beta.

The "Closed Beta" (Aug 7-8) is only available to:

-Those that signed up in BF Labs testing prior to July 31st.
-Got one of the TWITCH key drops a few days ago during the Dev Stream.
- Potentially if you have an EA-PRO sub (unconfirmed).
-If you watch a TWITCH streamer playing BF6 Aug 7-8th for 30 mins.

Either way, the Public beta is live this weekend so it's not like you are really missing out.

Originalmente postado por BoraBora:

Here we go again. The only legal ground to sue Steam (Steam being the seller) is having paid for the UE BEFORE the latest postponing in march. Postponing the delivery of a product for un unreasonable delay is a breach of contract so the seller must refund the buyer. USA or EU, it doesn't matter, it's a ground rule in business and general trade.

Unreasonable delay is not a breach of contract. If a time for completion or launch is expressly stated in the contract - i.e. a specific release date is stated when you purchase the product - and that time limit is passed, it goes to election. The purchaser may either elect to dismiss the breach, either by express or implied conduct or through acquiescence (i.e. not refunding the game upon notice of delay), or to seek remedies for the breach through a refund or whatnot.

TLDR delay is only a breach of contract if the buyer is put on notice and elects to seek remedies. If they dismiss the breach and accept a later date, you can not go back later and sue for that breach.

I am not too sure what the EU law's stance is but it is safe to assume it is in-line with the Vienna Convention on the International Sale of Goods. Refer to articles 47(1) and 49(2). Refer to article 51(2) for part delivery of a good.

Any chance of a MacOS release ever?

Yes.

Originalmente postado por 𝑺𝒚𝒛𝒐𝒕𝒉:

Originalmente postado por CorporateHammer:

Just don't buy it. No need to dictate availability for everyone.

Of course we won't be buying something that's not been made with quality and detail as a game SHOULD BE

I love how you say "we" as if you speak with any sort of authority of other people. *You* won't be buying it.

1:1 please

Originalmente postado por m:

there isn't a lot of products currently running at the high level where you can reasonably participate without direct P2W so its got a bit of a cornered market on broke people with good computers

other than this its all very small games with playerbases <100 active, so compared to those, its alive

It has nothing to do with "broke people with good computers", and way more to do with "I would rather pay $60 than have to pay $600 in a content butchered game just for the sake of getting more $ out of me".

Guess it is a taste thing?

treade