Resultados de búsqueda

Publicado originalmente por Hybrid:

Again no Aquila, is workshop that short for cash they couldn't give at least 50 Aqulia per event?

How much is that in USD? Do you live in the world's most impoverished ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ that playing 10 missions for 30 cents worth of aquilas is an appealing proposition? If so I have to wonder how you were able to afford a) the darktide software licences you're using, b) the PC you're playing darktide on.

With your body weight the boat will sink

Publicado originalmente por evilsplat:

They can shoot by themselves but not if I take control

Which version are you playing? Rebuild or normal?

The only thing expansion bring are elite specs. Everything else is worthless.

Publicado originalmente por Zwefla:

this mod is called ranked, its already installed in the standardversion.

thank you. I can't play online.

Publicado originalmente por Cash:

Tux & StimJunky ...

All the answers you seek can be found by reading the document.

If you had read the document you would realize that the information at question was accessed in June and they were fired effectively immediately on July 1st. So, they were employees of UWE at the time they accessed these UWE documents lol.

Also, I'm not sure how one "steals" e-mail correspondence and contracts one is a party to.

ça va?

So Paradox updated a game in wich i NEED UI mods because my screen is 4k and i want to see the game, not some blurry mess, so now i can't even play because thanks to the update makes me CTD when i click a planet thanks to the same mods i NEED to essentially see the game. Good job.

Publicado originalmente por Ironsights:

Gen rush as a strategy isn't really an issue, just like camping and tunneling as strategies are not really an issue. The problem is that gen rush is too effective in a balance sense. Look at it this way - the survivor team has to complete 6 objectives to win (1 door and 5 gens), whereas the killer must complete 12 objectives to win (12 hook states). If you count the killer as winning at three kills, go ahead and reduce that number to 9. I will, for the sake of argument.

So, the team that has 4 players working together has 6 objectives, but the single player team has 9. This is a fundamental imbalance of time. Perks are meant to correct this, but we are in a situation where the gen speed perks and SWF communication makes the pro survivor perks more efficient than the anti survivor perks, hence the killer's need to absolutely ruin someone as fast as possible in order to stand a chance at victory.

If we buffed killers, either in time to down or in gen protection, we can see this shift. The clown is a good example: time to down went down, gen rush is now less effective. But that is only one killer. So, we could buff all killers, or some perks to allow gen rush to be countered effectively or to make time to down shorter, reliably.

Alternatively, we could nerf gen rush directly, we could ham fist it by making generators harder in general, or we could nerf survivor chase perks. Unfortunately, historically speaking, BHVR has preferred to encourage survivor chase perks. They have certainly nerfed a couple, but most are still quite strong, and killer perks that allowed for camping, tunneling, and other non-chase related actions have been nerfed heavily. The devs seem to want action packed chases to be the core part of each match.

Action packed chases are fine, but when 1 survivor can force a 2-3 gen chase out of the killer, then we run into problems with Gen Rush, even when it isn't what the team is doing.

One of the easiest ways to reduce this issue would be to reduce the total number of pallets that spawn on a map, especially since there are perks to stand them back up and to rebuild them.

There are myriad other ideas and options on achieving balance, but this is becoming a wall of text so I will stop.

TLDR: gen rush is a problem because time to down in chase is too long and the survivor team is inherently more efficient than the killer team.

Your argument is heavily flawed, mate, because you do consider everything that weights in killer's favor as the survivors side, but do not consider what weights in survivors favor.
Unless you can arguable prove 4 survivors can do 5 gens and escape without : Altruism, running the killer, interactions with killer's mechanics, etc (If doing gens is the only objective of survs and hunting/killing survs is the only killer's objective, then you already have a proof survivors have thrice as much objectives as the killer, as they do have 1 chase, 1 unhook and 1 healing per hook).
Stop trying to argue with flawed BS please, that's becoming cringe now.
Good survivors are way too powerful, that's a fact.
But the killer holds as much overpowered imbalance when facing unexperienced/weak survivors, and the devs objective is to make it so ANY player can eventually win.
What you are after is making it so killers always win the game, and that's where you are embarrassing.

添加：“废除过去一百年内，清朝政府与列强签订的一系列不平等条约”