검색 결과

295,108,962개 중 41~50개 표시 중
93
FAST INVITES TO DEADLOCK (BUSY RN)
방금
slxsh
1
Bug/Mod Conflict Report
방금
The Nungler
10
Two bugs I've encountered so far after Voyagers 6.0 update
방금
grumpymoose
6
the hack'n slash with rigged difficulty...
1
All crossover (Killzone & Halo) weapons need a buff
방금
SHOKK♥
73
Invitation code
방금
Tohsaka
17
The Third Edict Launch Twitch Drops and New Discord Quest
방금
Emil
8
Do I just have a dirty mind, or does Akai have some lewd lines?
5
I have never played any game
방금
Nev Nev
19
Choosing factions and their victory
방금
psychotron666
JediKnightSky 님이 먼저 게시:
Julia Skye 님이 먼저 게시:
I've not watched the Fallout TV show, but heard about what happen to New Vegas and how it upsets people. Whoever side the player chooses and gives the faction victory, what's the point in choosing a side and having multiple endings, when there's going to be or is already any confirmation that someone already won?

I can be totally wrong, but this can happen in any fanbase: There's freedom in a game, choose whoever you want to side with, but then there's canon where a side is chosen or whatever and it affects the game, like what's the point of choosing a side if someone is gonna win in canon?

OFF TOPIC EXAMPLE: In Skyrim, you have the Imperials and Stormcloaks, you choose a side. Let's say that someone chooses the Stormcloaks, if there's any confirmations that the Imperials won in the Civil War, then there's no point in taking sides when one has a victory canon.
Rather a :fsad: pov. Plenty of games that are part of series very much have canonical endings despite having options to do other things as a player.

Heck, one of the most popular classic D&D settings and novel series Dragonlance had premade character options for players, but also allowed players to take on the adventures from the novels in their own way. But that doesnt change the fact that the novels and their stories exist, nor makes the players doing their own thing on those premade modules any less valid a player experience.

And I hate to tell you but in the case of New Vegas we actually have known for years more or less that everything we see in the game gets wiped away, that has been common enough knowledge among those who read more than reddit posts.

Basically certain creatures and things in the DLCs spread and within a matter of months after the games events, every living thing in the region is more or less dead. Been one of those things leaked from the companies official lore bible they have laying around the office for more than a few years.

So frankly if they decide it was something other than spreading creatures and toxic clouds that wiped out the region, but rather a good old nuking, well it wont break my heart.


This wasn't some leaked secret, this is what Ulysses tells you in lonesome road DLC. But also at the end of the dlc you prove he's crazy and kill his ass.

There's no fallout bible lore bible sitting around some offices.

The fallout bible was the series of documents that Chris avellone wrote for fallout 1 and 2 and included plans for the original fallout 3 (now called van Buren, many which elements were reused for new Vegas).

Your post sounds like you got this information from bad AI chat bots, taking bits and pieces of unrelated things with grains of truth, and mashed together into one big lie that the AI just came up with using the information it had (as AI does quite regularly).

Your post is nonsense, and I'd suggest you actually learn about fallout from the games themselves instead of asking AI chat bots questions about the lore.
295,108,962개 중 41~50개 표시 중