검색 결과

294,713,042개 중 11~20개 표시 중
178
85
Ukrainian localization request for Silksong
방금
cinnabar
9
1
Former ESO Player - How egregious is the Cash Shop?
방금
Ashkorne
2
Removing content to sell it for a third of the game's price day 1 should be illegal.
방금
ArmedTerror
0
♥♥♥♥♥♥ звуки какого то мужика в казино
방금
cMepTHuk|DST
131
6
Rigged garbage is rigged
방금
anaris
RavenousMonk 님이 먼저 게시:
ethorin101 님이 먼저 게시:
...I don't understand the argument that "when you lose you spend money, therefore Hasbro wants you to lose"...

Like... especially for MTGA, you don't spend money because you lost, you spend money because that new card is just so exciting/that style for this card you like is so cool/this Avatar makes you happy/This Companion is so neat.

But also MTGA is purely 1v1, which means one person wins and the other loses, which means if people losing actually makes people spend, it doesn't MATTER to Hasbro who loses, SOMEONE loses. Similarly, if winning makes you spend more, SOMEONE is already going to win, therefore it doesn't matter to Hasbro who that is. The claimed motive just... doesn't actually hold up.

And, of course, I haven't seen anyone claiming that they are always losing to people with cooler card styles, which is like, the closest MTGA could actually get to the one "Spending Optimizing Matchmaking" that's been so much as proposed by any game company.(EA, of course, submitted a patent about matchmaking people with people who were A. better at the game and B. had cool cosmetics, the idea was that when you saw their swag in the killcam you'd wanna buy it and there'd be a link right there in the killcam right to the buy button. AFAIK even EA hasn't implemented it, probably because it'd wind up degrading matchmaking to the point it stopped working because you couldn't actually reliably match players with people who were actually better than them)

Like, if you wanna complain about MTGA Monetization, the FOMO is right there dudes. If you wanna complain about the matchmaking fine, there's plenty of ways people think it could be better. But could you at least attack things that are coherent with reality? Please.

For starters, the money Hasbro makes is not in cosmetics, it's in Limited, Drafts, Arena Directs and Arena Opens, no one's charging their account to buy some sleeves or some card styles. Secondly, of course it matters to Hasbro, when you have a gap of 750 gems in limited for instance, you might be forced to lose and not get those 750 gems in the gap, whilst your opponent can win and just be 100 gems up for the first win. It's all mathematics, and to think there wasn't a team designing this to be consistently profitable for Hasbro in order for people to spend gems and then buy them out of frustration or addiction is simply oblivious. There are plenty of game theory books, game theory is literally a branch of mathematics, that are easy reads and explains the philosophy behind. I can't even tell if people are being serious anymore, it can only be on purpose, I refuse to believe that capitalism is such a hard concept to grasp. Hasbro uses mechanisms protected under their ToS to cheat on the consumers and profit with it. I think the biggest conspiracy is to think a corporation with 4 billion dollars of annual revenue wouldn't try to profit with petty predatory schemes. That, for me, is the biggest conspiracy. It goes against the essence and number one rule of Capitalism: profit. It's so simple.

I honestly don't understand. Why is it so hard to believe when Wizards have been using illegal marketing strategies such as controlled scarcity to spike the prices? The same the diamond traders in Antwerp used. Literally lies about not supporting the secondary market but does everything to cater to speculators. Literally sold four booster packs of non-tournament-legal proxy cards for $999. Lmao. Ultimate cash-grab without any, but any regard for the consumer. Absolutely none. In the end, imagine actually supporting these actions. Whoever does hates everything MTG Arena could be and its playerbase, and their answers to the average player reflect that in its entirety. Part of the real problem, and not the solution.
this is a dumb opinion.

drafts cost them pennies. cosmetics cost them thousands of dollars. There are four drafts at a time; there are 350 cosmetics available at a time.

your argument, therefore, is "wizards hate making money and are trying to lose as much as possible by focusing on the wrong product"

also, artificial scarcity isn't even remotely illegal.
포럼내 "HELLDIVERS™ Support"
7
I got only one lobby avaible
방금
dead346
10
Why'd they start by remaking the 3rd game?
방금
Flickmann
포럼내 "Off Topic"
17
Cracker Barrel Changed Their Logo
방금
Bassturd
120
6
The Hunt Begins! - September 4
방금
GreedyKip
7
So, queue times >>> fair games in Marvel Rivals...
방금
Draknalor
294,713,042개 중 11~20개 표시 중