Keresési eredmények

Doctor Zalgo eredeti hozzászólása:

John-Silver eredeti hozzászólása:

It's not just MTG many social apps are requiring ID even, look into the oculus or meta, they require a CHILD'S ID.

I'm also certain that this is, to a degree to protect them against claims that their's literally marketing gambling towards children, watch in a week or so they'll announce that because of this data they can confirm that "majority" of our player base isn't kids and their not packaging gambling in spongebob and other child IPs for the sake of attracting kids into their gambling hole.

Are kids into spongebob or is it cashed up 30 somethings trying to recover their youth?

heh, when was the last season of avatar?

yeah the trams are kinda trash lol. idk why anyone would defend them

Wolf eredeti hozzászólása:

it sucks... but how did you auto target a friendly.

I do NOT fight around allies or neutral with turrets on. if I am fighting along side them i keep about 10 km away. too dangerous lol

I am wondering if you had turrets on and it made the hostile at which point you auto targeted them?

you can reload... but that sucks when its been an hour... but if you can just avoid them for link 15 minutes they will calm down.

I was using a S class ship attacking a L trader that the SCA owned. As I was going in guns blazing an ARG M flew in front of me and my guns targeted it and we hit it a few times.

this post AGAIN?... or did somebody just necropump it?


I already answered this : with prep or without?

without prep.. you talk 5000 nukes vs 270 without uk, 500 with them.. thats a problem
with prep of a few years europe can match that.

likewise without prep europe is outgunned (and weak by using usa equipment which usa might be able to deny parts and ammo for.. maybe even backdoor hack... and having little own weapon production)

-if usa went nucleair.. than europe would be wasted.. but using all their nukes would give freedom to russia and china to go mad....
still even if they used a more sensive 2000 of their arsenal.. they could no a lot of damage in densely populated europe.. in absolute kills 5000 nukes might kill 40% of europe.. but the damage it does to the infrastructure would be so much worse...
some nations in europe will be bettger off.. than others.. the radius on nukes cannot kill more than a fraction.. blast not large enough.. and the fallout is only dangerous a few weeks.. after that you can scoop topsoil scrap crops.. and try to rebuild..
bombs radiate hard.. but have a fast halflife..
those nations with enough bombshelters to last out these 2 weeks will be able to bounce back more than very urbanised nations with few of those shelters.

(my own netherlands is pretty much screwed dense population, cold war bombshelters all broken down.. no longer excistig)


the 270 or 500 nukes europe has right now (depending if uk does join in or not).. would be enough to kill a couple tens of millions of americans. or destroy a lot of valueble infrastructure...


so there be no winners.. there.. europe might live after being nuked and so will usa.. such an exchange is not worth ending.. but it will not be pleasant for either..

=====
so lets presume a traditional war..

if usa went conventianal. trying to take only greenland.. they would succeed but we would keep landing guerelliaattacks making it too costly to hold it... but they likely would hold it and I not see europe soon having invasion of usa capability...

but you bet euroipe would set up it's arm industry and match and surpass usa in a decade or two.. if they than use thatto retake greenland... or not.. thats up in the air... more likely it be a cold war... with proxiattacks in greenland

-if usa went invasion of europe.. surprise attack,.. without they would at first be able to advance likely taking rotterdam and denmark and possiblle..
-than resistance would be mounted and they be halted.. invading across an ocean is hard in ww2 usa had production capacity it now has not... and prepared years.. it now does not.. and had england to launch from it now does not...

so we would see that advance halted... than europe would start building up it's arms production.. and eventually push the usa out...

usa thus might initially be able to take chunks of europe.. it takes much more troops to occupy land as opressor than to conqurt it
usa is great in shock and awe.. not so great in this long term occupation.... let alone against a capable opponent..

this is why eventually usa would be streched to the limit and cannnot expand any further.... and from that point.. europe would eventually slowly start taking land back.,.. though it likely will take a while especially with much of the weathier industry and best ports in american hands... to fight back...

in desperation we might even switch to china or even russia.. basicly turning to america's enemies forr defendce (hey if we allied with bloody communists.. in ww2.. why not china and russia if usa is the invader)

that that aid would cost us likely some land in europe and the freedom on taiwan.. well we also lost colonies and world power status in ww2.. so thats likely the price of defeating usa..

Jack Catman eredeti hozzászólása:

...Please at least consider returning it in the state it is in so people who wanted to grab it still get the chance, even if just temporarily.

We can't actually undo what we did, that Steam option is "one way". We'll continue working with Steam to get the DLC back onto the store, there might just be a bit of a delay.

Homer Pimpson eredeti hozzászólása:

GÆMUя GφD eredeti hozzászólása:

You should play kf 1/2, you don't know what you're talking about.
the old syringes didn't heal you much unless you healed another person and they went on long cooldowns, which meant you had to have skill to survive and were rewarded via another syringe. It was already a perfect system that people loved, they just wanted to jump on the hero shooter bandwagon for KF3 because of greed.

Or...kf3 is a fun game and if you don't care for it kf1 and kf2 exist so what's the issue? why are you here? go play those? things evolve and change, clearly you do not.

Absolutely ignorant comment. And you are the one that brought up the previous games. Your reply is incoherent to what we were talking about. Starting to think you're an insincere shill..

Tannin eredeti hozzászólása:

Only after his first approach, force, fails him does he try to relate.

You keep lying:

You only fight real renoir once, and you think no dialogue occurs before that fight?

He tries talking her out of the painting... (Alicia-stans just call this fake news though)
(#feelings over facts, #believe all women, #I stan Alicia)

Guess what Alicia does? She gets tired of listening to her father, and draws her sword...
(no I meant what Alicia actually does, not what you believe she did in your fan-canon)

During this conversation, Alicia attacks Renoir <-- (that's called being the aggressor)
(psst: this is when the battle with real renoir begins)

Alicia is soooooooo addicted to the canvas she would rather fight her father than reason
(she's just going to kill everyone who tries to separate her from the canvas)

Alicia-stans wouldn't exist if they weren't so disconnected from the events of the game

wont let the game be what it is:

as Alicia is to the canvas, Alicia-stans are to their fan-canon
(just more violently so)

There you go
https://discord.gg/suicidesquadrs

I can play every other game fine but not this one.
I have a 9070XT and a 7800X3D and it runs like ♥♥♥♥.
Nothing have changed since release ..

さっきから何回か切断されるんだけど