Αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Voroff:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Dwerklesberry:

You think the early colonists were reddit atheists?

Is this what they taught you at school?

That is not a proof, and your schools are not even good at teaching reading, or basic mathematics, and absolutely not about teaching critical thinking.


Come on, convince me of your claim. Your claim, your burden of proof :)

Yea sure, we had 169 years of reddit atheism from the colonists landing to the founding of the United States, totally believable stuff guys.

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Mike:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από ItsRay:

Just remember these threads - quote me and give me literal hell for being wrong in a few months.

I won't be

People will forget about your gibberish the 2nd they leave these forums, you think a bit too highly of yourself lol

How am I thinking high of myself when you are the ones to dismiss my concerns? Show me then how wrong I am lol

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Reskal:

Again - you need to consume every-single-drop of HOR.

That was it, thanks ! I cared more about was comes in and what leaves how fast, and that did it. Now refinery produces HSO 25m³/min, and the assembler behind uses 25m³ HSO up per minute, for the smokeless powder, no stops at rubber anymore, sigh.

Not just the HOR.

Anything tied to the Refineries needs to never have any of it's outputs stop.

You'll figure out your own system and how you want things done.

This is all part of the process of learning how to deal with "Chained Byproduct" recipes.

How do you have that many quartz but only enough uranium rods for two advanced nuclear generators? If you're trying to avoid engaging in automated production chains you are going to have a bad time. Once you have drones you should retool your base to produce everything automatically. Build a dozen more nuclear plants and get to it.

Do you already have a portal generator running? Do large high difficulty wrecks and pray for energy multiplier fuses.

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από brainless:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Grumpy:

Hm maybe you're right, i'm guessing it's because some frames "look" like someone.

When the Necron does his final attack, something weird is going on with Gustave's model and it looks like he's being taken away.

But he has to be saved from that though, and only Verso would make sense here.

Why save gustave here, if he's just going to let him die later? Why save gustave, and maybe others, if he isn't going to take them to one of the manors like he did with alicia as well?

No idea but he just have the highter percentage in this scenario.

The other scenario is that Gustave got propelled by the Nevron's explosion into an other part of the map.

Or painted Renoir wanted a snack for later.

Completed SWAT 4 this evening, 20 years late.
Expansion is next.

Completed 12 of 13 missions on Hard, a handful of early ones on Elite. But, the last one, only managed a Normal.

I have to admit that my frustration level, especially in the last few missions, was pretty darn high.

I've experienced the same as many reviewers did back in 2005. Ai teammates that get progressively more difficult to rely on as you get near the later missions.

As the maps become slightly more complex in corridors and rooms filled with various clutter, you use them less and less to bang and clear.


Early on, your team seems like an elite. They can bang and clear and have suspects on their knees. The fist half of the game feels like when you see swat/police videos.

The last 1/3 of the game, started feeling like I was dealing with mindless zombies. I can't use them for room clearing anymore, because enemies will literally gun them down. Or, they watch me get gunned-down. I can't count on them for much, other than carrying taser, spray, pepper-gun and wedges.

Near the mid-game, I found that ordering them to throw a gas grenade near the door, waiting 1/2 a second, and opening the door, was effective at subduing everyone. Most rooms weren't big enough that the gas wouldn't affect the ones in the room.

Later missions, though, asking my teammates to gas and clear often meant 1 or 2 went down before gas even had an effect. But, rooms too cluttered of big for flash.



This might sound like I am complaining a lot. In truth, I wouldn't "suffer" through the "frustration" if I didn't enjoy the game.

It really is a game that shines when it comes to the context of the missions. I love that the civilians often have some funny things to say when you are securing them. Perps as well.

RoN feels a little more serious when it comes to shouts and civilian/suspect response. Actually, feels way more realistic.

But, I kinda of really enjoy the subtle tongue-in-cheek humour of the tantrums civilians and suspects dish out when you do secure them (in swat 4).



Some things I would like to see in RoN, that I thought a lot about while playing Swat 4, is some form of Rules of Engagement.

Move quickly/Storm the room, move slow/be quiet, use lethal, use non-lethal.. or some form of measured response to the situation. How quickly to retaliate to situations.
Or forcing the teammates to ignore civilians, or handle civilians.


The amount of times I had to restart missions in Swat 4, because as I'm trying to secure a room, or send them to wedge a very important door, I see 4 teammates yelling non-stop at a civilian to get down, when some suspect enters the room from that door I was trying to get wedged, and guns them down.

I think, my biggest frustration though, was how much the teammates seem to not acknowledge commands during the last 1/4 of the game. Command. No reply. Command. No reply. Command. Acknowledged.


Regardless, it def was a game worth playing.

Onto the expansion!!

G rƎe n ⅃ um A

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από wenslydail:

The game doesn't have ultra-wide support.

uhhhhhh it supports ultrawide....... 3440x1440 works fine so that's 21:9 support. Maybe you mean super ultra wide which is 32:9 which would be 5120x1440 or 7680x2160

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από salamander:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Hilariously enough a majority of the "LGB without the T" rhetoric was actually found to be spouted by sockpuppet accounts owned by straight men. More food for thought.

aye, i am aware of this unfortunately. while there are genuinely some LGB peoples who are anti T, most of the time it is just a hetero person pretending to be LGB and pushing anti trans rhetoric to push division. usually any time an LGBTQ+ person posts really, really far right stuff i am quite suspicious that they are perhaps just a "sockpuppet" or such, like you said. playing a role, maybe they are russian. likely even, considering the Z propaganda factories that rain hell on the internet these days.

There's also factoring in that there are very small toxic subsets, even in the LGBT+ crowd. Such as "Gold Star" gays.

Also bi erasure is a thing amongst both LGBT+ crowds and straight folk.

Regardless, it's up to us to just treat people like people. And correct misinformation aimed at spreading hate when we're able.

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Maverick:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Not Big Surprise:

good job displaying what i said about infantilization

btw adam and eve did not know good and evil until after eating the fruit; they quite literally could not have known that disobeying god was a bad thing
and before anyone says it, it was not a matter of "lol they should've known the rules", because they were created without the capacity to actually comprehend the concept of rules

and are we supposed to believe hell doesn't exist, now?

Adam and Eve were receiving their education about good and evil from God. That was part of the deal or covenant they had: They could live forever as perfect beings in a perfect world, with everlasting joy and no suffering, and have pretty much everything a human could ever want.... all God asked from them was that they entrusted the knowledge of good and evil to Him and trust His commandments.

God told them plainly, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”

This is certainly not the only sentence he spoke about this to them. He definitely went into greater detail with them. There was NO QUESTION that disobeying this one commandment was a bad thing and would lead to bad things, but they listened to God's enemy and believed him over God. The rest is history.

none of this matters if they didn't even know what good and evil were
which, again, they didn't until after eating the fruit

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Houseman:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Not Big Surprise:

good job displaying what i said about infantilization

I don't know what you mean by that.

btw adam and eve did not know good and evil until after eating the fruit

Common misconception. The fruit of the tree did not literally impart knowledge of good and evil to them. They already knew what good and evil were. God spoke to Adam and Eve using words and language they understood. They knew that disobeying God was bad. That's why Satan, as the serpent, needed to lie to Eve and plant a seed of doubt in her mind.

and are we supposed to believe hell doesn't exist, now?

Yes, another common misconception.

how convenient