Όλες οι συζητήσεις > Φόρουμ Steam

Αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης

Ταξινόμηση ανά:

Αποτελέσματα για "南宁高中毕业证模板（证件网:ｂｚｗ９８５.ｃｏｍ)-哪里买南宁高中毕业证模板<网址:ｚｊｗ２１１.ｃｏｍ>-合作南宁高中毕业证模板哪里做-哪里办南宁高中毕业证模板Rv"

< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 29,448,367 >

Εμφάνιση 21-30 από 294,483,663 καταχωρίσεις

Στο φόρουμ «The First Descendant Γενικές συζητήσεις»

Developers PLEASE purchase a Calculator!

Μόλις τώρα

Exobine

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Jade Succubus:
Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Sakura Bun:
I'm not a fan of the numerically illiterate 20% x 100 = 120 and similar in the stats of items.

A lot of the numbers aren't even accurate to what they actually do.

Actual spaghetti code.

Στο φόρουμ «Counter-Strike 2 Ανταλλαγές»

💎💎💎 𝑻𝑹𝑨𝑫𝑬 𝑲𝑵𝑰𝑭𝑬𝑺 / 𝑮𝑳𝑶𝑽𝑬𝑺 / 𝑺𝑲𝑰𝑵𝑺 / 𝑶𝑷𝑬𝑵 𝑰𝑵𝑽𝑬𝑵𝑻𝑶𝑹𝒀 10𝒌 $ 💎💎💎

Μόλις τώρα

Nico

Στο φόρουμ «巴哈姆特1-REMAKE Γενικές συζητήσεις»

無限迷宮

Μόλις τώρα

ღSONICO♫

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Qmo:
私心希望勇者之心能改回來太經典了

我也好懷念勇者之心QQ 這代武器很多但就是沒有勇者專屬的

Στο φόρουμ «Deadlock Συμβάντα και ανακοινώσεις»

259

Six New Heroes

Μόλις τώρα

soren

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από MightyFineIncredible:
The art style in Deadlock just keeps getting better. The thick outlines and shading on character models create an unique look, emphasizing each character silhouette strikingly.
It's like the devs looked at TF2's artstyle and asked, "how do we make this even better?"

did you... seriously use chatgpt to write a comment on a steam forum? how lazy can people be?

Στο φόρουμ «Marvel Rivals Γενικές συζητήσεις»

You still solo queuing?

Μόλις τώρα

j.yellow28

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Seraphiel:
Solo Queing is pointless, you need to have a full squad to play.

but after gold u cant have a full squad sooo?

Im fine solo queing and sometimes duo if a friend is playing.

Στο φόρουμ «Castle Crashers Γενικές συζητήσεις»

Which Star Trek characters would y'all want

Μόλις τώρα

fish_powered

can we get a darth vader? (this is a joke)

Στο φόρουμ «Team Fortress 2 Γενικές συζητήσεις»

Racism and bigotry in TF2: it's here and why it needs to stop

Μόλις τώρα

Pirate Baby Harp Seal

The key really is in the notion of 'community'. It is what we want it to be. Those who do not fit in, either do not belong or learn to belong. Those who refuse to belong are ostracized. That might be done via policing (e.g moderators or popular vote like vote kicking) and/or social pressure. We might come to agree that bigotry should not be tolerated and therefore police or pressure other members of our community to behave according to that agreement."
I ain't no master debater or good with words, but I noticed you said quite a few we/us in your argument, which I'm not quoting the entire thing (sounds like you're writing a college paper or asked AI to write it since you even typed "it is common sense that"). Who is "we"? Do you mean "you"? If you do not fit in, learn to fit in or belong as toxic as that sounds. Those who refuse to belong are ostracized, right? Find a custom server where it isn't allowed if you hate it this much, or do you have to add that people shouldn't have to find custom servers to find like minded people? Racism is bad even if it can be funny to people except social justice warriors that get offended at the behalf of other people, but if someone can't handle racism, nazis, meme edgelords, furries, gay/trans, or jokes, then TF2/L4D2 (games which being able to say whatever is part of the appeal) probably isn't the game for that person and there are other f2p, shooting, competitive and not stress-free games, which are not rated M, that have a family friendly atmosphere which openly have gay stuff, which by the way you'd be surprised at how many people IRL don't really like gay stuff "everywhere" although it is becoming more common in the gaming community. Feel free to point out, or ask AI to point out, all my logical fallacies, which pointing out fallacies is a fallacy by the way.
If I was better with words, I'd find the flaw of saying "good behavior makes people feel welcome therefore we should be always on good behavior." You're good with words so you can find the flaw of me saying that gatekeeping isn't always a bad thing.

tl;dr I disagree partially because unfiltered text/voice chat is an appeal to the game, as long as any character can laugh taunt in the middle of a voice line that calls "need"ing something, then it wont be going away soon. then after that it would eventually be saying that you cant criticize someones playing skills or banter because that hurts their feelings and everything has to be positive all the time

Στο φόρουμ «Company of Heroes 2 Ανταλλαγές»

[H] 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 [W] 1:1+1 - cross set welcome

Μόλις τώρα

Margeoline

I have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 from Company of Heroes 2

SAME SET TRADE:
I do not trade less then 1:1+1 (2:2+1 is fine with me) BUT if there is no significant value deviation/gap between the cards you want to exchange then the supplementary card can come from ANY SET, NO MATTER ITS VALUE (any low cards from a 15 cards set will do as a + 1 card)
In all other cases (like an important value gap between the cards you want to trade), my acceptance will depend on the quality of your offer.

CROSS-SET TRADE:
I might also accept cross-set trade on 1:2 or 1:3 according to the situation
I usually do not accept Counter Strike 2 for a cross set trade

https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffer/new/?partner=1122365745&token=qtMkD6vw

Στο φόρουμ «Hardware and Operating Systems»

There is something I dont understand about Linux

Μόλις τώρα

Varsik

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από PopinFRESH:
Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Varsik:
...
So in Linux there is no rings? So you just have kernel and after that userspace and nothing else?

I don't know how many times I need to say the same thing. What you are referring to doesn't have to do with Linux and is a hardware feature of Intel's x86 CPU architecture. Other CPU architectures have other mechanisms for isolating hardware resources and do not use Intel's "rings". For example ARM has PL0 as a least privileged execution level for applications (e.g. user space), PL1 for operating system (e.g. kernel space), PL2 for hypervisors (e.g. virtualization that is below a guest's kernel space), and since v8 a PL3 for secure monitor / firmware interfaces. Other CPU architectures such as RISC-V also only have a machine mode M (e.g. for firmware interfaces), a supervisor mode S for the operating system (e.g. kernel space), and user mode U for user applications (e.g. user space).

Linux is designed to run on all of these and, specifically referring to the GNU linux kernel development, there is no use or purpose in using "ring 1" or "ring 2" on x86 architectures or treating them any differently than other architectures.

If you don't believe me; take it from the guy who created it..., I'm fairly sure he probably knows a bit more than the abotrion does.

https://yarchive.net/comp/linux/x86_rings.html

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Linus Torvalds:

That may be the politically sensitive (except to Intel) correct answer,
but in the end I suspect that the _real_ answer is that ring 1/2 are just
fundamentally useless, and it has nothing to do with x86 implementation
semantics or anything else.

Any kind of reasonable performance driver requires direct access to the
buffers it is going to fill in. And not just the actual data contents, but
to the metadata too - the pointers that comprise the skb (or in BSD, mbuf)
lists, etc.

So even if you were to use ring1/2 for the driver, you'd really need to
give write access to a large portion of the data structures that the
"core" kernel networking would use.

Which means that you either put the core kernel in ring1/2 as well (at
which point you don't actually use ring0 for anything interesting at all -
you could put a microkernel there, but hey, there's no real point), or you
map in a _lot_ of ring0 metadata into ring1/2, at which point you lost the
whole point of using a different protection domain.

And quite frankly, if you're willing to actually dynamically map all the
ranges and be careful, why use ring1/2 at all? You might as well use ring3
and make the whole thing be a user-mode wrapper. You'd never perform
really well, but for debugging it is acceptable.

Anyway, whatever way you turn, ring1/2 just don't actually _give_ you
anything. Which is, in the end, the _real_ reason nobody uses them.

(I agree, the fact that the x86 paging hardware makes 1/2/3 be equivalent
makes it an even _less_ useful abstraction, but I think it is a mistake to
think that it would be any more useful even if the page tables wasted
precious bits on unnecessary level information).

Multi-ring was a failure. Let it go. The only reason it is making
something of a comeback (Palladium-whatever-it-is-called-today) has no
good technical reasons, and is purely about other things.

Linus

EDIT: Also to add more clarity, Linux is not alone in this. Most modern operating systems including Windows don't use ring1 or ring2 even on x86 machines; they generally only use "ring0" and "ring3"; e.g. they have a kernel mode and a user mode.

Does AMD have this have this ring hardware feature too?

< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 29,448,367 >

Εμφάνιση 21-30 από 294,483,663 καταχωρίσεις

Κανόνες συζητήσεων και οδηγίες

Αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης

Αναφορά ανάρτησης