Suchergebnisse

I feel its great decision to keep game difficulty lvl.

The Big problem is when Squad Carriers are too cheap everyone uses his 20 Alt Accounts, create 1-man Squads, buys them and you have a flood of Carriers which at the end crash the servers. Noone other than big Squads even need them.

The only thing I see is the opportunity to trade stuff like ships between people.
The big question is why Frontier revamps Squads and concentrate it on Squadron Carriers,
not on for examle a point, squad carrier or station which a squad builds with colonization, and declare it as "home", where you have your "Squad Vault".

I mean such a Squad based big update - and they just focus on squad carriers and don't think in a wider angle? C'mon, thats lame.

No.
I think you still have to research, so also no... but I don't really do outpost building.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Vampyr:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von TACNAYN!:

What's your issue with storage space? Not enough of it or low internet bandwidth?

The reality is that higher detail requires larger storage sizes. The Bloodsuckers in Heart of Chornobyl have 3 4k multichannel pbr texture sets. That's 16x the pixels for each texture, and 3 maps per set, then 3 sets. compared to the two map 1k (2k?) textures in the first games
2 to 8 million pixels in Stalker 1
vs
144million pixels for a bloodsucker in S2.
More pixels means more storage space

boundaries. Everything seems easy when you're not the one who has to do it.

lol I just want you to compare bloodsuckers from stalker 1 to stalker 2 and tell me that it makes sense for them to be 18 times bigger in file size for maybe a 3 times better graphic quality and thats being generous. Lol logically that makes no sense. This is like a bad joke that nobody has caught up on.

Not the point though. I originally made this post hoping to know if the game's optimization has improved and it has thats all I need.

But keep in mind each jump in graphics for game generations usually only require around 10-20 gigs more space for effectively doubling the graphic quality. Its obvious for anyone that grew up gaming that newer generations of programmers don't know how to code efficiently. Just because this has become common practice doesnt mean its the only way to do things.

Regardless not interested in arguing with people that think people doing a bad job is amazing work.

Thank you all for the responses.

IQ issues. Blames artwork size on “code”.

Generational complexity increases by orders of magnitude.

Always has been that way. We went from kilobytes in the 80s to gigabytes in 20 years.

The increase in game size has been slowing down over the past few years but you don’t see that. IQ issues.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dosto:

You know that epic is so garbage, so unwanted even they need to sent their shillbots to steam forums to defent it, lmao.

I guess no different than Valve sending in their shill bots to attack LotF2.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von NSVT:

She logged in from her computer with my account and bought platinum to buy cosmetics in the game. Legally, through a regular store. The reasons for the ban were that I transferred my account to third parties and made a purchase not from my computer.

Now - here is the thing, I am not saying it didn't go down via the normal store, but you gotta see this from the other side a bit to understand the reasoning.

If this was the first time she did this - to them it looked possible that someone nabbed your account. Then, depending on the login for that session (such as if Steam) - then it means they could have also been using your money for that transaction.

Lastly, you then confirmed violation of the TOS by confirming you did not buy the money, but someone else (they likely didn't care about who - anyone can lie about who they are if not present, and DE is not inclined to formally investigate at this point because you admitted awareness).

This is unfortunately nothing new - and DE is just ahead of the curve on this. Valve for example has a rule, that if you sold your Steam profile or gave it to a family member, that too can result in a permanent ban as "it's your account we provision on our platform with our rules - hard stop."

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mei:

So the plat you bought was from a 3rd party seller, not from the game store?

No, I think they are considering the "girlfriend" a 3rd party, as she spent her own money for OPs account. Instead of digging into the validity of the relationship however, they are treating it like 2 separate individuals who transacted Plat for ___ reason.

Like if you gave your brother money to run to the convenience store and buy a coke, he comes back with a MTN Dew for himself, what proof do you have for your parents that you gave him the money in the first place? Parents will ask the other kid (who could lie), and I think DE considers that and just says "Nah, too time consuming - perma ban".

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Octavia Goetia:

or B) reverts the textures back to how it is in the older release?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/4570/Warhammer_40000_Dawn_of_War__Anniversary_Edition/

Dayum, they have been cooking. Hope that new mode has coop.
Cool stuff!

And hopefully some pagans/barbarians like Vikings/Celts/Picts in the future.
Druids instead of monks, sacrificing lambs/people, berserkers, etc. would be neat.

I disagree, there are beautiful characters in the game. Pandora for example.