Résultats de la recherche

i meant the real release and not this beta version

the seal's description says: "Appear: Consume an adjacent Consumable to Attack 5 Twice. Whenever it kills an Enemy Create the Consumed token" (it was a seal+ in this instance)

when it consumes and kills an enemy, it creates the consumable that it consumed. from what i understand, consumables are not tokens. so it should say that it Creates the Consumed Consumable.

Пусть не будет крафтов танков и бронемашин без остовов этих самых танков и бронемашин. То есть, нашли сломанную/разбитую машину/грузовик, притащили, собрали/разобрали. И если с гражданской техникой всё в порядке, то военную попробуй ещё найди. Измените крафт оружия. Ну ниверю я что поселение выживальщиков может скрафтить снайперскую винтовку. Только покупка или постройка ЗАВОДА (большого, дорогущего и требовательного к навыкам), а не той кибитки пьяных инженеров. A! И добавьте что то типа навыков: инженер, строитель, учёный, доктор и др. С бустом к эффективности к профильному занятию.

Эта проблема исключительно владельцев видео карт АМД , разработчики уже решают эту проблему

Ritz a écrit :

I use lots of jugs to create a cold room in every house to make the food last longer, i never seem to have enough with wells on 10!

Yes of course :-)

The problem is:
- You build wells near the places where you need water, in order to be efficient.
- As soon as 1 person wants to get water from a certain well nearby, but another person already is heading to it (which happens frequently), the first person will instantly do a rather long walk to the next well. This is not efficient, isn't it?.

- Drink zones should work as they are supposed to do - places at rivers/lakes where people get water. When working at a distant field next to a river or lake it makes sense to get the water simply from there, doesn't it?
- Clanfolk should not confuse ice and water, these are different 'products'.

It's probably a small bug and there's a workaround by abandoning drink zones in winter.
I just want to report this bug because I understood that bug reporting (versus bug avoiding) is encouraged in this great game. I'm not complaining but just try to help eliminating bugs.

мексика из андера a écrit :

Shifundy a écrit :

да, он на себе даже проверил

у меня нет блока в кс2 https://csstats.gg/player/76561198317761385

ты не читер случайно ? в кс го первая нова, а в кс 2 22к рейтинга и игра на нюке 40 на 4

allsan6 a écrit :

Get a code from Twitch drops to play now. Open beta starts on the 9th.

Gotcha, i just figured since I purchased the game before open beta announcement and it says i was invited that i had the option. But thank you for clarifying

无法

kilmar álbergo garcía
the government had no intention to let him back, and the only reason he was able to was because of the pushback it caused

FB_Therapist_ForStarfieldAddicts a écrit :

mxmigui a écrit :

You're not the one to call me a cheater. I'm the one who reports pages, people, streamers, just like taisontv. All of this has nothing to do with what you're talking about. 1. You can't just consider PC users cheaters for wanting to use more systems on a PC. 2. It's a layer to prevent 15-year-olds from cheating with free and cheap GitHub hacks. 3. The pages I'm reporting are 100% operational with secure boot enabled and running, and with bf2042 in less than 24 hours.
I don't have any problem activating and deactivatingsecure boot them (in fact, I do). It's just to play a game. Yes, you read that correctly, A GAME. Many people will have to spend extra money to play it or say I can't.
You should understand people, their problems, and the state of life, to be spending extra money to play a little game.
Read the EULA and the terms of the data they'll collect for playing. There are tools to stop all the cheating, but they don't do it because they don't want to. Meanwhile, console users with their controllers can do it because it doesn't affect them.


Could you explain your blocks on Steam? I'm curious

You're throwing a lot of emotion into a discussion that was about technical standards and anti-cheat architecture.
Secure Boot isn’t about punishing users — it’s about reducing attack surfaces. That applies whether you're running a bank or a multiplayer shooter.

Nobody called you a cheater — the point was: if you're actively against Secure Boot on principle, you might want to ask yourself why.

As for Steam blocks: irrelevant. Let’s stay on topic.
You asked about Secure Boot and got a fact-based answer. What you do with it is up to you.

I can play, I have no problem enabling and disabling it, but if you know what you're talking about, you know there are cheaters, and this doesn't affect consoles.
I only use Windows for gaming while I use other systems for work. I have to keep enabling and disabling it for crap that won't work. You understand that, right? I wouldn't buy a PC just for Windows 11, much less just for one game. Are we crazy? There are measures and measures, and remember that the anti-cheat already worked at the kernel level and it never worked for them.
And it's not just Secure Boot.

It's TPM2, which I honestly don't care about.
Virtualization on and enable kernel isolation.
I noticed in BF6 that it consumes a lot of resources for graphics that are nowhere near superior to previous games in the series. I think the computer is doing a lot of extra work, and it's not related to the game. I don't know what the anti-cheat is doing.