Hakutulokset

Want offers

Krosis Priest lähetti viestin:

Gounie lähetti viestin:

What I mean is:

Even with 2,000 gold coins, which is supposed to be the hardest because it's the smallest amount possible, it's still too much because you can already do everything from the very first minute.

And when we have much more, like skirmishes, it's ridiculous. Most of them can be completed in less than 5 minutes, which isn't normal. For example, from memory, out of the 20 extreme ones, I think I did 17 in less than 5 minutes.

And the other skirmishes, old and new, are the same. They should have at least corrected that and set 2,000 (or less) for all of them, not 10,000 and so on...

So basically you chose to cheese the missions by rushing. There's a lot more ways you can cheese in this game, the question is if you want to have fun or not.

I am all for adding additional difficulty settings and more customization, but reducing starting gold is one of the worst ideas I can think of. Especially that the main issue most of the time is that in most missions, once you survive the first 5-10 minutes it's easy, whereas it should be the other way around (slower beginning, armageddon begins once everyone is set up) and reducing the player's starting gold would make this even worse.

Thats not cheesing the game dude.
Cheesing uses some sort of exploit to avoid a certain rule or mechanic that gives you an advantage that isnt intended.
Like stacking a gazillion archers on a tiny turret or tricking the AI into doing something that is stupid.

Rushing is simply using what you have to win the mission.
When the mission gives you 21k gold to start with then its intended to be used for mercenaries or other units to rush your opponents.

Adding more ways to tweak the experience for more of a challenge or fun skirmishes is a logical step.
I have seen several people streaming the game saying "it would have been cool if we could lower the starting gold to ZERO".
And i agree. It would make for a slower but more interesting session and offer more ways for difficulty/challenge.

Dont really understand why people constantly want to talk down objectively useful features.
If you dont need it, fine.
But adding more ways to customize the game is an objective plus by adding more features and replayability.
I mean, your take isnt even logically sound to begin with, but you also pull reasons out of thin air that make no sense for what gain?

I just would like to mention that Day 1 DLC is content in the game itself that is just sliced off content. It's already there in the game, already built. The developers who made the game itself will not reap any benefits from day 1 DLC either, mind you, only the executives and publishers are the ones who benefit from it.

Двери заработали. После общения с психологом о детстве возник черный экран. Игра зависла и не работает дальше.

Hmm, so there wont be more playable factions in the sequel?

So is this sorta like going from warcraft 1 to warcraft 2 to warcraft 3 and then wow?

Doesen't really matter as you get monsters over and over again with slightly different skins and movesets. I'm totally fine with skipping on monster variants gameplay wise.
If it wasn't for the materials for new gearsets I would skip them completly.

shut up hippie

I want a Blood Dragon Vampire Knight with necromancer powers and no boobies.

DOh!

chasing an experience that will not come back again

it also got me into source engine dev stuff

over a decade and I still can't make models