Search Results

Showing 11-20 of 293,853,750 entries
138
13
If you can, you should refund the game until Earthion eXA Label is released on PC, and the ROM is dumped decrypted.
Just now
RADR
Originally posted by AmethystViper:
Originally posted by FLY AWAY TC:
We need to show that we PC gamers mean business.

We will not accept anything less than the best. If ANCIENT and Limited Run Games reconsider and port the REAL Earthion to PC, go ahead and buy it then.

This is what I advocate for. No allowing artificial scarcity bullcrap.
>starts a harassment compaign against innocent devs
>encourages piracy of the game
>gets banned, proceeds to mald and seethe

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3545441507

Originally posted by midori:
They had zero reason to ban him, he wasn't rude. They don't like him, that's why he's banned. Plain and simple. They delete posts that aren't rude, UNBAN actually rude people etc. Pretty boring, yet predictable end to our hero's crusade here to be honest.
He's not a martyr, he's not looking out for the people, much less the consumers, and he's absolutely NOT a hero. People like you are just petty, entitled, selfish, unhinged, disrespectful, and toxic tumblrinas who got mad over the exA version and starting a flame war over nothing. He got what he had coming: Justice was served, C.O.D..

Originally posted by midori:
OP isn't doing anything wrong either, there aren't laws against this sort of thing. There aren't steam rules against it either. Thank you for stating your opinion finally. We can agree to disagree, at least I can. Do whatever you want.
Says the loser who openly insulted Yuzo Koshiro in a removed post, encouraging karens like yourself to harass the developers, forcing your opinions on people, and then having the audacity to think karens like you are in the right. You're no different from entitled crybabies getting upset over the modern Doom ports not having vertical mouselook like GZDoom or other source ports when it was never in the original material to begin with.

Originally posted by No Guard:
FLY AWAY was likely banned only because of the number of reports, because sadly that's how report systems usually work. But this person should have been banned because they're being incredibly harassing, insulting, and misinformative.

The entirety of FLY AWAY's original post makes an alarming number of assumptions and falsehoods about exA-Arcadia, about the arcade market past and present, about the intentions of Ancient, and so on. This person demands action based on misinformation and ignorance. FLY AWAY's entire argument boils down to "I'm not willing to follow clear and reasonable rules, and my unwillingness to do so is proof of anti-consumer behavior". I'm always trying to tell people that these grifters are looking for every opportunity they can to stop whining about EA or Microsoft or Nintendo or Konami or whoever, and go after small indie developers who are not doing anything wrong at all and who can't easily fight back. This should never be tolerated, under any circumstances.

Earthion was designed as a Genesis game. It was programmed for the Genesis platform itself and can be played on a real Genesis. Ancient did not "leave us with scraps", they released and are supporting the actual game they made. The exA version is a completely separate game, in this case made by completely separate people, not that it would matter or not if Ancient made the exA version as well. The entire point of exA-Arcadia is to get you to go to arcades. If you're not willing to do that, then no game for you. The idea that this is somehow "anti-consumer" is horrifying by itself, made all the more worse by there being so many people like FLY AWAY who want nothing less than to see arcades disappear for good.

Then you have midori, who's either a wingman or an alt, doing nothing more than defending every little thing FLY AWAY does while offering some misinformation of their own. They are asking you to be upset about certain games being removed from MAME, the arcade game emulator. Naturally, midori won't actually tell you that this is because those games are actively being sold by exA-Arcadia, and so it would be ridiculous to just let this situation stand as is. There's also a strong chance that the developer of the original games (CAVE) specifically asked exA-Arcadia to do this (it does not matter if CAVE actually did or not but it's still useful to note), and CAVE themselves have already done this once or twice in the past for the same reason; they were actively selling the games being emulated at the time. midori also keeps trying to namedrop the founder of exA-Arcadia, when it's this same founder that has contributed extensively to MAME. It's blatantly obvious that exA-Arcadia has no ill will towards MAME and that this is entirely a small political issue. It's also blatantly obvious that the people claiming to take issue with this are bad actors, who care nothing about "game preservation" and just want things for free.

There's more nonsense going on here, but it's just that: nonsense. Ancient and exA-Arcadia are not in the wrong about any of this. FLY AWAY and midori are completely in the wrong, and care absolutely nothing about "consumer advocacy". Calling people like FLY AWAY and midori out for blatant harassment and misinformation does not make you a "shill". It's not any more complicated than this.
I bet you they're also the type to cry wolf when things don't go their way too like a lot of grifters and toxic fanboys on the Steam forums. If they actually cared about wanting the exA version on anything other than the exA-Arcadia, they should have been supporting Earthion and let them know in a more civil manner that people are interested in that version too, which shouldn't that far from the realm of possibility since Strania -The Stella Machina- EX is did get released on Switch (and I wished was brought to PC) and is based on the exA-Arcadia version. If Earthion doesn't get the exA version brought else to anywhere else, then whatever, I'm not losing sleep over it, especially when what I've played so far has been great and incredibly impressive what Ancient has done on actual Mega Drive hardware. I've been following the project since Ancient announced Earthion and I walked very satisfied with what I got out of it, But NOOOOOOOO, instead enjoying a technically impressive and fun Sega Mega Drive shoot 'em up game with another excellent soundtrack from Yuzo Koshiro, they want to boycott the game, vilify Yuzo and exA-Arcadia for the most pettiest of reasons, act high and mighty like they know everything (plot twist: they don't, especially with "gems" like this), throw the most idiotic buzzwords around and claim that the exA version is a "psi-op" or "condones anti-consumer practices" (*facepalms*), and then harass anyone who calls them out on their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ or won't take part of their entitled karen parade.

And people wonder why we don't get nice things anymore...

There's also posts like this. At what point in time did OP ever state that he was advocating for piracy?
2
Panzer
Just now
milan.mrlian
2
Week 8 Patch 1.5.1 – Memory-Leak Fix & Performance Boost
Just now
top0817
10
Greetings, pls give me advice as complete newbie
Just now
hitman_2
6
Pq Trump tá humilhando o Brasil?
Just now
NEET
2
Nuka Launcher posters
Just now
PittsburghBeard
71
9
Female characters are here to stay! (DEAL WITH IT!)
Just now
Bͥatͣmͫan
224
22
Boycotting the game until "secure boot" pre-req is removed.
Just now
BanryuTV
232
12
To those who say “it’s just quick play”
Just now
LULULEMON
545
Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin
Just now
GameKyuubi
> Every day, without exaggeration, I see a new institution announcing the adoption of bitcoin as their primary treasury reserve asset and unit of account; this is what bitcoin is made for.

No, if you actually read the original whitepaper that is not what it was for. The paper is literally titled: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic CASH System" It was not designed to be a reserve asset, it was not designed for nation-states to use for their own purposes, it was not designed to be "digital gold". It was designed for immutable and transparent transactions on a public ledger.

> The core bitcoin block-chain was never meant to be used as a primary medium of exchange

You truly don't have any idea of what you're talking about, do you?

> There is almost zero overhead with using lightning network

You mean except for how obnoxious it is to set up without relying on a 3rd party? I'm not talking about overhead on the network; high speed and low transaction fees are not something unique to BTC.

> The association of bitcoin with "crypto" is what has set us back, and only a few years, not anywhere near 10 years.

Spoken truly like fresh blood to the scene. You obviously haven't been in this space long enough. Global BTC adoption was growing rapidly until the blocksize ♥♥♥♥♥♥, and then usage plummeted dramatically for a long time. If you were around for that time period, you would understand that we're just now breaking even with where we were 10 years ago.

> The price of BCH is so low not because bitcoin moves first, but because it lost the block war and nobody cares about it.

BCH lost the block size war because Samson Mow, former director of the moneygrubbing, manipulative, talentless, hack of a company Ubisoft, saw an opportunity to make a bunch of money by inserting his company Blockstream inbetween people using BTC, poured a bunch of money into advertising for small blocks and putting minions in the right places to take over the BTC repo. I've met this guy in person. He is just another slimeball businessman promoting his own product as a solution to a problem he helped create.

> They tried to change the rules of an already perfectly designed technology and failed because of it. Nothing continues to function properly if you change the rules, this is exactly why the fiat monetary system is broken; the rules are flexible.

Absolutely no way you're this ****ing stupid. Segwit and lightning are what changed the rules in an attempt to change it from cash to gold and to create a space for investors to skim off the top. The whole point of BCH is to stick to Satoshi's cash concept. The original whitepaper doesn't even mention a block size limit. The 1MB block size was added to prevent certain kinds of network attacks, not to bottleneck the network and allow scammers to insert themselves into the project. But keep on vomiting up Mow's propaganda. Everyone else does, after all!

> You can argue all you want, but I guarantee that time will prove me correct.

Correct about what? That BTC will remain on top? I never suggested otherwise. I think you're probably right there, but the reason that will happen has absolutely nothing to do with anything you're spouting.

> We are at the inflection point where we move from "early adopters" to "early majority adoption"

You are not an early adopter. It is very easy to tell.
Showing 11-20 of 293,853,750 entries