Search Results

Originally posted by Ghosty Face:

why everyone show their chars from back, its not too cool

Because it is "usually" the gameplay view from their chars.
Front or side view is mostly "for screenshot only".

Originally posted by waleffe12:

help with lothric pls

i sent request you still didnt accept

I brought 5 chars into endgame in 0.2.0, I actually love running campaign lol

Originally posted by Alteisen32:

Still cant login says my account does not exist, RIP 1.6k hours and money spent

and me

Originally posted by niro55:

Три раза он, вроде, дернулся, а остальные стрелы будто сквозь него пролетают). Может хит-бокс поломанный какой-то...Кроме лука пока нет ничего, это самое начало. В зомбей без проблем попадаю с того же расстояния...

Раньше у зомби был подобный баг в области чуть ниже головы у них была "дырка" через которую пролетали пули-стрелы.
Видимо у оленей сейчас тоже самое. Но у меня проблем нет - стреляю в корпус.

mmmmda

Originally posted by Mattlock:

Originally posted by SaLaĐiN:

DLSS increases latency, if you were able to feel the latency as you think you are you would have noticed it.

dlss upscaling does not increase latency, frame gen does.

Bruh, it literally creates frames from additional 3 frames, it is a layer on top of a layer performing additional computing, it must increase latency, basic physics.

Originally posted by Depressed Rodent:

Originally posted by Cecilie:

I personally think having more time skip options would narrow the gameplay utterly much. So far, I once had to play through survive with family quest since my pups was very late in getting full experience, and I frankly loved playing through the rest of the winter with the pack until it was time choosing a den. It didn't take a long time, and I for one hope they include this quest as a main quest to complete before you can choose a den for your next litter, instead of just skipping past everything to get there faster.

If they do this I'd want that to be optional (maybe we could manually timeskip). Winter is already wayyy too long in both the Survive with Family and the Young Hunters quests. Maybe early spring would be a better spot for it though, since most players just immediately run to a den and don't really get to admire the odd beauty of the season

Most players don't really seem to have much fun in any of the survive quests... because honestly it's just Young Hunters (which can already drag on too much for some) but without any of the objectives, it's just "Wait for a little bit"

Maybe an option to skip having pups for a year without having to kill your mate is a good compromise here. I know I wanted to do that once and I had to risk all of my young hunters trying to kill that mate.

Partly agree. I think having that as an option would be a good compromise for each players with different cravings. I personally feel young hunter quest isnt long, because it just ends as soon as your pups has been through 10 border hexes and has 100% experience. Hunt several elks and fight off rival packs makes this quest fast and easy, but it all depends on each playstyle here. I don't have much competition from the rival packs because I've reduced their packs to the leader pairs or the leaders having one companion with them, which gives me enough room and safety to hunt elks with the pups and this shoots their experience up a lot.

Feel like survive with the family quest should be added however, because it makes more sense to live through the season before you chose a den, instead of just skipping time all the time. You skip a lot of time after choosing a den to get your pups, then it skips again when they are 15 pounds, and then again when reached 25 pounds. Theres a lot of skips, which maybe should be reduced, but as you said, having a manual option where you can turn this feature off and on could make everyone happy according to what they want.

I don't agree with your idea on the pups thing though, since: firstly, there is already a pop-up question in game before the mating season starts: asking you if you want to play alone or accept the trial mate (if any) in order to get pups that year. You can already choose not to, and then play a year without any litters, but this can result in your pack disbanding, I assume? I haven't tried yet so I'm not completely sure, but if that's the case, I also think that's a fair consequence of your choice of path you take, that your packmates will leave to create their own packs since you decide to not mate and continue the pack legacy.

But if there was a choice where you could click yes or no to having pups each season, the game will definitely become boring in the long run, because you won't have to risk anything to do the path you wish for when you can just click yes or no to have pups each year, and still have your entire pack and mate linger around. So to this I would be against since it narrows the gameplay down a lot, at least in my eyes.

Ну че, свидетели силы США, теперь и статистика побед по рейтингу подъехала. И ой, чем выше рейтинг тем больше процент побед у РФ

Hey.
- IF you currently can't find anyone, or nobody responds here.
Then, you can join Skall's small Community Discord Server.
- We're trying to gather as much of players as we can, so people have
place to find other players to play games with.
> (Since you're trying to find player for Co-Op or Merc/Versus) <
Not just RE5 but olso other Multiplayer Games.

- We are at this moment quite small group, but in future,
when we gather more players it will be more easy to find others to play games with.

- IF you are interested, come and join:
https://discord.gg/EREUyDPNKH
We will be more that happy to see you there!